Coffee heat rising

Early practice for early retirement

Wow! I just figured out what the furlough means to my budget. My hourly pay is about $30 an hour: that’s $240 a day. If they make me take one unpaid day a week for the next 12 weeks, that’s a gross pay cut of $480 per paycheck or $960 a month. My net biweekly pay will drop from $1,537 to $1,215. That is less than my reduced budget for nonmonthly recurring bills (i.e., it’s less than I spend on groceries, household and yard products, gasoline, and nonrecurring bills such as the vet or the plumber).

furloughjpg

It’s less than I would earn if I retired, took Social Security and 4% of my savings after the Investment House mortgage, freelanced, and taught two sections of freshman comp at a community college.

yr1retirement

Now, there are some mitigating circumstances here.

First, that retirement net income doesn’t reflect the astonishing cost of Medicare, which, by the time you pay for Part D (the required prescription insurance that drops you into a “doughnut hole” if you get sick enough to really need a lot of medications) and the supplemental insurance needed to pick up the slack, comes to around $300 a month. Right now I pay $26 a month for a plan that covers everything, including the Mayo Clinic and prescriptions, with $10 or $20 copays. Because I’m not yet at Medicare age, if I quit now I’d have to take COBRA, which will cost $475 a month.

Second, the fact is that today we get our so-called “extra” biweekly paycheck. It can be prorated out over the next twelve weeks to help cover the shortfall. It means I won’t be able to use it as part of my emergency savings in case of layoff—which, frankly, I believe is a near certainty. However, it will help.

And third, we can claim unemployment for each furloughed day. That will be a HUGE hassle: you apparently have to fill out all the forms and jump through the hoops for every single claim. So it may not be worth the trouble. But it’s there.

Any way you look at it, the “golden years” of my life are going to be pretty gray. You can see from the above that the amount I will have to live on under the best of circumstances—working two part-time jobs—will be very limited. When I reach the age when I can no longer work, which won’t be many more years from now, I will be living in poverty. Even after we sell the Investment House and I can use the full 4% drawdown from my life savings, the numbers look like this:

ssprojection

I can’t even begin to imagine how I will live on that, with $300 (or, by then, more) taken out for Medicare.

Well, one good thing about this furlough business: starting today, I’m going to get some practice at living on it.

Furloughed! Parboil the fruits before canning?

Well, I found out about it from NPR news first, while driving home through the interminable rush-hour traffic: every Great Desert University employee is to be furloughed between now and the end of the fiscal year, June 30. When I raced in the house and pulled up my e-mail, yea verily, there was a message from Our Beloved President, outlining the plan to balance the university’s budget on its employees’ backs.

Administrators are being zapped for 15 days—that’s three weekswith no pay! Classified staff, which would include my associate editor, who earns less than she was earning as a graduate research assistant, get off with a mere ten days. And everyone else—that would be moi—will face 12 no-pay days.

Apparently we’re being allowed to string it out over the rest of the fiscal year; 17 1/2 weeks. The particular configuration of the furloughs, though, depends on one’s supervisor’s whim. So, for me, if they allow me to to take off one day a week, that would cut my pay by two days for each paycheck—$480—between now and the end of the fiscal year. Assuming, of course, that I last for the rest of the fiscal year.

Think of that: a $480 pay cut. Thank you so much, Georgie Porgie and all your doctrinaire ideologue puppeteers!

We can, we’re told, claim unemployment insurance for the unpaid days. Unemployment in Arizona is pretty piddling—a tiny fraction of what you earn. And it’s such a hassle to claim it that if you have any other source of income to fall back on, it’s hardly worth bothering.

Our bread-and-butter client just e-mailed asking if we’ll take on not one but two new projects. You betcha, sister!

Personal finance IS politics

A few days ago, JD posted posted a request at Get Rich Slowly as he was coping with the unexpected passing of a dear friend:

Finally, please stop sending me anti-Obama links. I’m not going to post them. I don’t post pro-Obama links, either. Nor did I post links in opposition to or in favor of President Bush.  Get Rich Slowly is not a political blog, and it’s not about to become one. The political divisiveness in the U.S. makes me tense, and I refuse to contribute to it.

This elicited some conversation, among which was a comment from Steve of Brip Blap:

I hear what you’re saying, and I wouldn’t want to see you start launching into political polemics on GRS…but unfortunately politics have a huge impact on personal finances (taxes, retirement savings laws, and on and on). The divisiveness is there for a reason – politicians have drastically different ideas about how we should be able to handle our own money.

So I understand completely where you’re coming from in regards to the blog – no sense in going there – but it’s a huge part of what’s going to happen with our money in the future. We will all need to contribute to whichever side we think is right.

800px-united_states_one_dollar_bill_obverseI have to agree with Steve: although I wouldn’t ask JD (or anyone else) to hold forth on topics that make him uncomfortable, the fact is that politics and personal finance are so tightly intertwined, there’s no separating them. In fact, I’d go so far as to say that personal finance and politics are aspects of the same thing.

We are all suffering today because a decade ago (much longer, really, looking back to the Reagan years) we elected a party whose dogma was largely based on some misguided theories. Among these was the idea that the market will keep itself healthy and on track if left to its own accord. This theory has given us unbridled greed and irresponsibility, eleven million people out of work, depressed salaries for those of us who have managed to hold onto our jobs, a plague of foreclosures that is casting millions of Americans out of their homes, astronomical gas price spikes, a failing healthcare system, collapsing banks, and the prospect of another Great Depression. The fix for this mess will saddle our kids and our grandkids with national debt, high taxes, and a lowered standard of living, and you can be sure the politics that will come out of that circumstance will be interesting, indeed.

Bill Clinton’s byword, “It’s the economy, stupid,” put this fact in a nutshell: politics and money are the same thing. Free-market economics is a political theory every bit as much as it is an economic theory, and it was imposed, in an extreme form, on our nation through the workings of politics.

That’s why it’s so urgently important for Americans to be well educated in the history of their country and in the history of the world: votes made in ignorance lead to disaster, such as the one we’re seeing today. It’s why we need a free press, and why the collapse of the Fourth Estate poses an enormous threat to America’s republic. We need to understand the workings of our government’s leadership, and the easiest way to spread that understanding to the largest number of people is through a free press that focuses on something other than celebrity antics.

And it’s why as Americans we need to return to honest, forthright discussion and quit sniping at each other. The bitter conflicts, the nasty behavior, the substitution of crass rudeness for “debate” that have been fomented in certain quarters for the purpose of putting a specific party in the dominant position it has held for the past decade need to come to an end. If we are to escape the quicksand that’s fast sucking us to our economic doom, we must work together in a political and a politick way to make things as right as we can make them.

Funny about Money will continue to refer to political topics, and incivility will not be tolerated here. I make no secret of my opinion of the Bush Administration and its controllers. And I respect the right of others to disagree: politely.

Integrity, Confidence, and Trust: A financial manager’s view of the economy and the future

This is a guest post by Stephen Taddie, managing partner of Stellar Capital Management, LLC, located in Phoenix, Arizona. Stellar, which manages my vast fortune, has contrived to keep my shirt and my IRA more or less intact as the economy has crumbled around our ears. The essay, which provides some insight into what capital managers and financial advisors think of the events leading up to the current recession and offers some prognostication about the near-term economic future, was Mr. Taddie’s New Year’s message to the firm’s clients.

People in positions of power often claim to have integrity, and the public needs to have confidence in those people in order to trust the system. The sheer number of “ethically challenged” individuals who have surfaced lately makes it increasingly difficult to see through the haze of hypocrisy and to trust anything. At present, we are seeing a crisis in confidence so great that many investors are willing to accept a zero return just to have the U.S. government hold their funds.

If you take a quick glance around the country, you’ll find a governor who attempted to sell a senate seat, a self-anointed savior of the masses (also a governor) patronizing a prostitution ring, a senator convicted of several felonies almost winning an election, and numerous other government officials taking liberties, receiving special treatment or deals. Those in professional sports also continue to be ethically challenged, from athletes doping to referees influencing games for personal benefit. Hollywood and the music industry provide enough content year-in and year-out to keep thousands of magazines, newspapers, and web sites in business. Remarkably, we allow this type of behavior to continue by giving candidates our votes and contributions, as we buy tickets, magazines and memorabilia for morally bankrupt celebrities. Integrity has been all but lost in political maneuvering, convenient omissions, and downright deceit.

I left the financial industry out of the previous paragraph only because its problems have been so plentiful it needed its own paragraph! Bigger, better, more complex has been the cry from Wall Street for the last decade, and that has produced overpaid, ethically challenged executives; programs and products like hedge funds and subprime loans; and fund-of-funds and credit default swaps. The list goes on and on. As things grew more complex, investors found themselves further removed from their money and the people actually responsible for its well being. Although stockholders could always vote on the tenure and compensation of a company’s management, most investors are not in a position to do so in a meaningful way. When twice removed from the actual investment, as is the case when investing in a manager of managers program or in mutual funds, investors must rely on highly paid executives to vote on the tenure and high salary of other executives, in a more or less self-perpetuating cycle. for most individual investors, exerting shareholder control has become a thing of the past.

As Warren Buffet said, “It’s only when the tide goes out that you learn who’s been swimming naked.” Growth hides many structural problems and 2008 was a year of revelations. Take the case of hard-money lenders. In many parts of the country these firms were lending money directly to developers and builders and offering steady 12 percent returns to investors. A few years ago, Stellar interviewed two such local firms and, after substantial due diligence, decided to wait out the brewing storm. In general, we saw that these programs were losing sustainability because of lack of appreciation and new buyer interest in development projects. One firm, now in the headlines, lacked enough internal controls for our comfort, and we eliminated them from consideration. I’m sure other firms like ours made similar decisions;but some did not. More recently, Bernie Madoff’s complex “Ponzi” scheme made the headlines, leaving a mess for investors and regulators. In both cases, integrity was lacking and trust was betrayed. Other firms misrepresented the scope of their services, appearing to be sophisticated money managers on the outside, but when the tide went out, were found to be nothing more than high-priced marketers or “feeders” for the real manager of the assets, offering no real value to their clients.

To recover from the present economic ills, massive stimulus programs are being worked into the system. This has effectively put a safety net under the economy in an effort to restore confidence. As confidence replaces fear, a valid case can be made for either a “¾ V-shaped” recovery, where the economy recovers into a less leveraged, slower-growth version of itself; or a “W-shaped” recovery with a double-dip recession beginning near the end of 2010. Due to decreased leverage in the global economic system, a more typical “V-shaped,” or complete, recovery does not seem likely in this cycle.

Barring more surprises, the economy should transition from stimulus-driven economic activity to organically driven growth late in 2009, leading to a ¾ V-recovery. As we approach 2011, the prospects of higher tax rates due to “sunset” provisions in the current tax code could cause economic activity to accelerate. This would create an after-the-fact lull in economic activity, pushing it back to recessionary levels in 2011, leading to more of a W-shaped recovery. The eventual shape of the recovery depends on how and how much stimulus is deployed, the extent and timing of its removal, and other policies established to smooth the transition both here and abroad.

At some point, the investment markets will turn around. Since mid-November, the S&P 500 has risen about 20 percent, rebounding from “technical support” and building a potential “bottom” around the 900 level. Volatility has calmed down a bit, and liquidity seems to be returning to the markets. However, that has not stopped the yield on 10-year U.S. Treasury bonds from falling to levels not seen since 1955, and coming close to the lows experienced during World War II. The economy is still trying to find a stable footing, and economic data in the next few months will probably continue to be ugly, but the markets may have already discounted the expected data and may be beginning to look beyond the present abyss.

While we believe that world affairs are in better shape than they were during World War II, the bigger issue facing capitalistic societies today is “trust.” Without it, the economy will stumble; with it, it will thrive. When trust comes back to the system, investors will be less willing to park money in essentially noninterest-bearing Treasury bonds and more interested in making educated, longer-term investments.

Here’s to trust…Happy New Year!

January 1, 2009

Legislators propose to shoot us all in the foot

More scary news from the Great Desert University: Our beloved president sends an announcement that our ever-astonishing legislators yesterday recommended cutting the university systems’ funding by $243 million in what remains of FY 2009 and then by another $388 million in 2010. That is huge: the largest cuts in higher education in the state’s entire history. And this is not a state known for its support of education.

Arizona has only three public universities, and you can count the private institutions of higher education on the fingers of one hand. None of these are exactly world-class institutions. A few departments are excellent: the University of Arizona, for example, has one of the world’s leading astrophysics programs, and Arizona State University has cultivated a good business school and a research emphasis in bioengineering. But by and large the universities reflect the general quality of education in this state, which as we have seen before, is not high. In an Arizona university classroom, it’s possible to guess with some accuracy which students grew up in the Midwestern states where citizens invest in education, simply by observing the students’ basic writing and logical thinking skills. Nine times out of ten, I can identify a kid who came from Ohio, Minnesota, or Iowa just by reading a paper or two.

This is the direct result of Arizona’s chronic underfunding and neglect of education.

“Budget reductions of this magnitude,” says Arizona State University President Michael Crow, “would have a serious and immediate impact on university operations.” The $39 million that had already been cut in the 18 months leading up to FY 2009 have so far resulted in the elimination of almost 500 staff positions and more 200 faculty associates, the dismantling of two schools, and a reduction in the number of nursing students.

Arizona State University serves 67,000 students. It graduates 14,000 a year, and its president claims it pumps $3.2 billion a year into the state’s economy. The planned cuts, Crow reports, will require additional layoffs, furloughs, and reduction of programs that already have enrolled students for 2009.”The fact that the legislature has known about the state budget problems for months and failed to take appropriate and effective action to minimize harm to Arizona’s families and economy is unconscionable,” he adds.

Unconscionable, yes. But surprising or anything new? No. This kind of thing is standard operating practice, historically, for the state’s legislative leadership.

With Governor Janet Napolitano leaving to head up Homeland Security, the state loses its strongest advocate for intelligence and commonsense, one whom our legislators have resisted and fought every step of the way. Her replacement will, according to the state’s constitution, be the present secretary of state, a dim light whose politics and retrograde thinking echo those of the blessedly exiting presidential administration.

Our new governor, heaven help us, is the woman who is responsible for state employees losing all choice in health-care plans: her husband, an executive of a large insurance company, was involved in submitting a bid for the contract to insure state employees that was below the break-even point, so that Blue Cross/Blue Shield, at the time the only decent insurer we had, pulled out in protest of the blatant conflict of interest. For a time, we had just one insurer, the one for which our new governor’s husband worked. This company was so roundly hated by the medical profession that many doctors (including most of mine) would not accept it. If you wanted to go to your doctor, you had to pay in cash and then try to extract the money yourself from the insurer, a process that at best required three to six months. My dermatologist would not let me set foot in his office, even after I said I would pay in cash! To get care from the doctors I knew were reasonably competent,I had to buy my own insurance on the open market. Today the state has to self-insure its employees, thanks to that fiasco.

And she’s pretty typical, this new governor. Remember, this is the state that once elected Evan Mecham, the stupidest holder of elected office in the nation’s history. After Mecham made a laughingstock of Arizona, his predecessor, an affably muddle-headed fellow, looked smart: he was the one who announced that he had never read a book from cover to cover except the Bible and had finished school with a junior college diploma—and he didn’t see why anyone else needed to do anything any different. After all, look how far he’d gone!

That one’s favorite byword was (I kid you not!) “It’s a beautiful day in Arizona. Leave us all enjoy it.”

You can see where all this is going: straight back to the Dark Ages.

So, to personalize, it appears that the danger of a layoff where I’m concerned is still very real and very immediate. The university’s administrators are already firing library staff, and I’m sure they soon will move beyond that.

Related Posts:
The Devastation of Higher Education in Arizona
The Perqs of Penny-Pinching

LOL! Georgie, we’ll miss ya!

Did you hear our soon-to-be-former President’s farewell press conference? I thought the high point came when he remarked that the press had “misunderestimated” him. {snark!} The man just can’t leave bad enough alone.

Another excellent moment arrived when he observed that he came into the presidency in a recession and is leaving it in a recession, but in between (like, oh, say the proverbial night bird flying through windows of the lighted beer hall) the economy has thrived. I will refrain from exclaiming Jesus H. Christ. Well, no. I won’t. As I recall, the country had no deficit (in fact, we had a budget surplus) when the Shrub took office, nor was anyone speculating about the onset of a second Great Depression.

What a moron. What a shameful episode in our country’s history. Heaven help us all now.