Coffee heat rising

The great no-‘poo experiment!

Check out Chance’s new project at Room Farm: an experiment to spring free of commercial shampoos! Can’t wait to see how this works out.

Some Blogger sites refuse to recognize my existence in any permutation, and Chance’s is one of them. So I’ll try just adding my two cents here:

Back in the Cretaceous, we had shampoo but no one shampooed every day. We didn’t have conditioners of the sort available today—to get rid of the frizzies and tear-jerking tangles, we used this pink liquid (don’t recall the brand name) that you squirted on with a pump sprayer and combed through your hair. While it did get rid of mare’s nests and static fly-away, it left your hair kinda limp.

In the absence of hand-held blow dryers, washing your hair was a major project: you had to set your hair with bobby pins (twisting little pincurls allll over your head!) or, in later years, with rollers, and then you either slept in them overnight or you sat under a bonnet dryer for anywhere between one and three hours, depending on how long and thick your hair was.

Women in recent years have been bamboozled into dousing their heads with various chemical brews every day, when really it’s not necessary. One’s hair did start to get a little greasy-looking after a week, but the truth is most women’s hair can go for three days or so before really needing to be washed. 

In the past, I’ve used Neutrogena bar soap on my hair. It’s a little harsh, but it will get your hair clean. I found it drying, and if you get the stuff in your eyes it hurts like the dickens…probably not a good sign. Baby shampoo works quite effectively on women’s hair and is pretty mild. Like grown-up shampoos, it contains many ingredients straight out of a chemistry lab. 

Hair conditioner alone can be substituted for shampoo, at least for a few washings. It tends to build up in the hair like liquid fabric softener in the washer, not surprising since we’ve discovered that you can use hair conditioner in place of fabric softener. Here in the Southwest, ordinary bar soap makes a mess of your hair, because most areas have pretty hard water. This can be ameliorated to some degree by rinsing with diluted vinegar or lemon juice.

I’ve also used dish detergent in a pinch. It works exactly like shampoo, with exactly the same results…not surprising, since shampoo is your basic detergent. Clear Ivory dish detergent behaves just like shampoo, except at the cash register.

It’ll be interesting to see how Chance makes out with the baking soda-&-vinegar treatment. If you could use that on your hair and olive oil on your face, you’d go a long way toward breaking the grip of the cosmetics industry on women’s everyday lives.

A little frugality goes a long way

Well, I was about to say “I amaze me with my frugality,” but the truth is, I haven’t been pinching pennies any more rigorously than usual. That notwithstanding, despite almost $1,000 in “extraordinary” (read “not in the budget”) expenses, I’m only going to have to pull about $245 out of savings to cover this month’s charges. 

dcp_2529Yes. This month I ran amok with the extraordinary expenses. To kick off the budget cycle, a Talbot’s junket racked up an $86 debit when I succumbed to the lure of the Sale! tag. Got a cute little top at B’Gauze, also allegedly on sale at the bargain price of $47. Then we chose this month for Mrs. Micah to migrate Funny to BlueHost, which was quite the project. Her fee was amazingly reasonable, but it also could be viewed as outside the realm of ordinary costs. Next, nothing would do but what I had to harden the security on my office right this minute, in light of the swarm of burglaries the neighborhood has seen: $295 for purchase, delivery, and installation of a solid-core door plus $281 for purchase and installation of a pick-proof, drill-proof lock and metal door guard. (Gulp!) Moving on, the locksmith profited further when Bila the Painter couldn’t figure out how to remove the (very involved!) antique Baldwin lock from the front door at the downtown house: $150 for two visits, one to get it off the door and one to put it back on. All these added up to an astonishing $969.67 in extraordinary expenses.

Gasp!
😯

My de jure budget now has me spending $1,200 on ordinary, day-to-day expenses, such as gasoline, food, household goods, and whatnot. That amount should cover one or two out-of-the-ordinary costs, such as a visit from the plumber or a trip to the veterinarian’s office. Against the desired $1,200 limit, I’m actually $396 in the red. But the de facto amount that goes into the credit-card piggy bank (a money market checking account earning a little interest) is $1,500; anything that doesn’t get spent out of that sits in the account and serves as emergency back-up. Against the $1,500, I’m “only” about $245 in the red. As a practical matter, the accrued cushion in that piggy-bank account will cover it, so I really won’t have to transfer a dime from savings to pay for this month’s spending extravaganza.

Could I have exercised some restraint?

Well…yeah. I needed some summer clothes, but you know, there’s no law that says just because a store is advertising a sale you have to run right in and buy stuff. The clothing purchases could have been deferred to the end of the month, at which time I would have been out of money and so wouldn’t have bought the shirts at all. Staying out of Talbot’s and B’Gauze would have cut the deficit by $133, leaving me a modest $112 in the red. 

But some of these things really needed to be done now: I wanted to install the door and lock while I still have an income from the Great Desert University. And theoretically the locksmith’s work on the downtown house could be included in the cost of the paint job, which is coming from a different piggy bank. The project to monetize Funny needed to start soon, so I would have some time to learn how all that works and possibly to improve earnings from the site before I’m out of work. Eight or nine months seems like a pretty short lead time, really: that was a sooner-the-better proposition.

So, I don’t feel too bad about all this. Riding the train (and taking two weeks of vacation time, eliminating a bunch of endless gas-guzzling commutes) eliminated one gas fill-up. Thanks to the stash in the freezer, I haven’t had to buy much food. And the stockpiling strategy allowed me to put off purchase of a few household items into the next budget cycle. 

Once I’m retired, of course, $1,200  will have to be the real maximum expenditure limit, and not a pretend “can I really live on this” figure. As a practical matter, I’ll have to come in well under $1,200 in most months to get by. That will be a challenge as inflation rises. But right now I’m spending significantly less than that in ordinary, day-to-day expenditures. If I spent about $970 in extraordinary expenses and overdrew the $1,200 budget by only $400, that means regular, routine costs consumed about $570 less than budgeted ordinary expenses. (I think: arithmetic is not a science that serves me well.) 

Whether that figure is right or wrong, it’s pretty clear I can eat, drink, and make merry on less than $1,200 a month. Meanwhile, with the Renovation Loan now paid off, recurring monthly bills drop from $840 to $670, a figure that will drop another $30 when I cash in a whole life policy in January (because I have to pay taxes on the proceeds, I’ll need to put that off till I have no earned income to speak of). 

So let’s say I can expect to spend maybe $1,000 a month on routine living expenses. That plus the remaining $640 in recurring bills comes to $1,640 a month, or $19,680 a year. Think of that: a retired person can (in theory) live on less than 20 grand! For me, investment income alone will almost cover that.

Of course, we still have my share of the downtown house’s mortgage: $9,600/year. The net on $13,944 in Social Security benefits should cover that, but if not, I’ll earn more than $9,600 teaching at the community college. So, even after taxes, any freelance income will be pure gravy.

Although some observers might regard my lifestyle as ascetic (I refrain from spending on cable TV or a cell phone, for example, and I rarely go out to eat), I don’t think of myself as extremely frugal. I never clip coupons, I don’t pursue freebies from CVS, I buy my clothes new, and any day I’d  rather own a book than borrow it from the library. I eat like the Queen of Sheba and do not stint on wine and beer purchases. 

The trick is to get out of debt, including mortgage debt. Once the house and the car are paid for (and you’re not trapped under a load of revolving debt), you’re home free—given decent retirement savings. Without a huge cost for the roof over your head, a very moderate level of frugality will allow you to live quite comfortably.

Two new blogs

These have little or nothing to do with personal finance, but… Here are two blogs you might enjoy.

One is by my friend Judy Galbraith, who teaches journalism at Paradise Valley Community College and writes affectingly about subjects ranging from her obvious professional commitment to censorship, politics, and the good life. 

And not to be missed is Let’s Call Him Bob, a hilarious journal of my pal VickyC’s rambunctious dating life. This promises to get more and more amazing as it grows!

Check those out. 🙂

Credit card companies to penalize “freeloaders”: What’s your plan?

As we know, credit card companies call people who pay their bills on time and in full “freeloaders,” and management highly resents such deadbeats because they’re not cash cows like people who sink over their heads in usurious debt. Credit-card issuers make something on us bums, of course, because each charged transaction nicks the merchant a percentage of the sale price. But it’s nothing like the criminal interest rates and extra gouges they get from people who run a tab on their cards.

Well, if you’re one of those losers who pays your bills on time, watch out! The legislation pending in Congress to limit credit-card penalties and curb wacko punitive fees is about to backfire on you. In response to having to quit ripping off feckless consumers who can’t or won’t clear their credit-card debt, the nation’s banks are about to curtail cashback and other rewards, eliminate grace periods, and sock every card user with an annual fee. As American Bankers Association CEO Edward L. Yingling told the New York Times, “It will be a different business. Those that manage their credit well will in some degree subsidize those that have credit problems.”

Don’t think so, Ed. Charge me a fee to carry your plastic around in my purse, and you can have the piece of plastic back. I, for one, do not and will not pay an annual fee (or any other kind of fee) for the privilege of going into debt at a usurious rate. While it’s a great convenience to have an American Express and a Visa card in hand, it sure doesn’t come under the heading of “necessity.”

So, what will we do if suddenly all our credit card issuers inform us that cash kickbacks and airline miles are things of the past, that we now have to pony up $25 or so to use any credit card, and that the grace period for paying one’s bill has died?

The AMEX cashback scheme is the sole reason I use my Costco American Express card for every purchase I make. The reason I got the AMEX card in the first place is that Costco quit accepting any other credit card at its gas pumps, which dispense the cheapest gas in town. Costco won’t accept cash for gasoline, and I don’t care to use a debit card. If AMEX reneged on its cashback plan, I probably would continue to use the card exactly as I do now, because it’s a great convenience and because the “float” between charge date and payoff date makes it easy to manage my budget. 

However, if they demanded an annual fee, I’d cancel the card in an instant. Ditto the Visa card.

There are some good reasons to have a credit card, most of them related to booking travel arrangements and to the extra back-up in case of a dispute with a merchant. I’d be sorry to see the cards go, but go they would if I were made to pay to carry them around.

In lieu of cards…what? There are several fine alternatives:

• Use a debit card instead. Costco’s gas pumps accept debit cards, and so do most other merchants. Disadvantages: it’s a fair way to bounce a transaction, and there’s little or no protection if someone steals the thing and hacks into your account.

• Pay recurring bills with EFTs from your checking account, not by charging them on your credit card. Disadvantage: some vendors won’t accept EFTs. But they may change their attitude when their best customers dump credit cards.

• Use cash. Some people find they spend less when they carry cash instead of a charge card. I personally have the opposite experience: cash flows through my fingers like water, and at the end of the day I have no clue where it went. But I suppose you could keep every receipt and enter it in Quicken or Excel; if that helps you keep a grip on credit-card spending, it presumably would do the same for cash.

• Use checks. This creates a paper trail, just as charge card statements do. Disadvantage, of course, is that checks are an expensive nuisance. 

My strategy: First, to find out if policies to shaft us “deadbeats” apply to the Visa cards available through the credit union. If not, get one of those; if so, get a debit card and start using lots more cash.

Times reporter Andrew Martin reminisces that in the good old days only the best consumers could get credit cards—and indeed, I do recall the time when flashing a credit card advertised your status. Now everyone will know that only the worst money managers have to use credit cards—pulling out a credit card at the grocery check-out will signal fellow shoppers that you can’t afford to pay your bills in cash.

What do you plan to do if your credit card issuer yanks your benefits and proposes to charge you an annual fee?

109 in the shade!

painterM’hijito remarked that Bila the Painter will earn more in two days, painting the exterior woodwork on the downtown house, than either M’hijito or I bring home in a week. And one thing you have to say about painting: you can’t offshore it to India!

On the other hand: what does it really mean to earn more in two days as a skilled tradesman than a white-collar worker earns in a week?

Well… Today we broke another heat record for May 18. By midafternoon, thermometers on M’hijito’s patio, my patio, and SDXB’s patio all registered 109 degrees. That’s in the shade. A hundred-and-nine-degree day is, in a word, HOT. Bila earns his living climbing up and down ladders, hauling paint around, and slathering or spraying the stuff everyplace he can get it. And “everyplace he can get it” is as likely to be in the full sun as in the shade. 

M’hijito took a paid day off today to dance the Workman Waltz. If Bila takes a day off, being self-employed, he doesn’t get paid. At all.

The incredibly complex antique Baldwin lock did not remove readily from the door that Bila planned to sand and refinish. So we had to call the locksmith who specializes in museum pieces, and wait an hour on him. M’hijito and I went to breakfast in the interim. When we got back, Bila was sitting in the front yard gazing into space: the locksmith had yet to show up. If M’hijito and I unavoidably kill a little time on the job, we generally get paid. If Bila wastes time on the job, it’s time that will likely make him late to the next job: again, time he doesn’t get paid for.

Bila pays for the paint out of his fee. I’d guess he’ll buy about $200 worth of Dunn-Edwards’s best.

That brings his pay down to about what I bring home for two weeks—after a furlough day is taken out.

But he still hasn’t bought health insurance, paid self-employed FICA, ponied up other state and federal taxes, paid for the gas to run his truck, put money aside in an IRA…. A fair estimate is that all those costs would consume about 40% of his after-paint gross. 

$950 fee – $200 for paint = $750
$750 – 40% = $450, approximate net pay for about two days’ work

Supposing Bila actually got five days of work a week (a big supposition, especially in the present economy): $225/day x 5 = $1125/week, net

My take-home pay for a week without a furlough day is about $760. So, if Bila works very, very hard, he earns significantly more than I do. But very, very hard is the operative term:

• He’s doing a back-breaking, mind-numbing job outside in 109-degree heat.
To earn enough to support his family, he has to do it five to seven days a week.
• If he can’t get a job on a given day, he earns nothing.
• If he’s sick or hurt, he earns nothing. 
Any vacation time he chooses to take is unpaid. 

There’s a lot of paint splattered on Bila’s side of the fence, so it’s hard to tell what color the grass is over there. But I’ll bet it’s not any greener than mine!

Nothing like a 109-degree day to make us wage slaves appreciate what we have.

Images
Housepainter: Lukeroberts at Wikipedia Commons
Paint cans: Sherwin-Williams 

w00t! Times has PF frenzy!

OMG. This morning’s New York Times, ever in touch with the whims of the moment, has gone overboard in its coverage of personal finance and frugality. And as usual, they’re a day late and a dollar short (sorry, Times editors: but what can you do when you have to steer a 1,500-ton flagship?). 

To start with, over at Get Rich Slowly, Mrs. JD published a highly entertaining piece on the virtues (and drawbacks) of DIY. Hoot! She scooped the FRONT PAGE (no less) of the Times by a full day! Appearing in print a good 24 hours later, Times reporter Susan Saulny comes forward with some of the funniest DIY disasters on record…okay, okay! They’re not funny if they happen to you. But if they don’t…heeeeee!

The entire freaking Times Sunday Magazine is devoted to PF issues, right down to Randy Cohen’s column, “The Ethicist.” We were given a heads-up on this by Frugal Scholar, who, before the magazine hit the newsstands, got a conversation going, with a follow-up, on financial writer Edmund Andrews’s so-scary-I’m-hiding-under-the-bed article about his journey toward desperate indebtedness. The mag, which features a mildly annoying photo of Suze Orman on the cover and an eye-glazing profile inside, is quite the tour de force. A really creepy piece on credit card companies’ interest in the psychology of tu et moi (by Charles DuHigg) struck me as easier to read than David Leonhardt’s no doubt much more significant article on the economic relationship between China and the U.S. Overall, it’s good, very good.

But oh, my friends, and ah, my foes: bloggers got there first!

😀