Coffee heat rising

Why I Hate Teaching

It’s not just because it’s stupidly underpaid.

Not because you have to establish a Roman emperor’s dominion over teenagers who are disrespectful to everyone around them.

Not so much because the benighted ignorance with which American students pass out of secondary schools leaves one weeping for one’s country and for its hapless children.

Not because reading their drivel is excruciatingly time-consuming and excruciatingly boring.

Not even because spending one’s time trying to assess said drivel intelligently and trying to advise its authors in ways to write less idiotic pap is a heartbreaking waste of energy and hours.

No. Not necessarily those things.

It is because no matter how much effort you put into them, no matter how much faith and hope you invest in your students, sooner or later they will disappoint you.

And you will be disappointed not just in them but in yourself and in your profession and in the entire flicking society around you.

They cheat. They lie and they cheat. And they do it all the time. It is so routine as to be unremarkable. And it’s not the ones who are so hopelessly dense that they have to cheat to pass a lightweight course like freshman comp. No. Half the time, God help us, it’s the smart ones.

I just returned (and forwarded to the division chair) a 300-point paper that failed because a good third of it is a copy-and-paste job.

Annoyingly, the author is one of my favorite students. She’s bright and gregarious and funny and she even seems to be paying attention in class. And, even more annoyingly, she’s no young kid who might be expected not to know better. This is a grown woman, thirty-five…maybe even pushing forty. And she’s a pretty typical plagiarist: smart, articulate, and full of potential.

Why do they do this? They’re not cheating anybody but themselves. They’re not cheating me. They’re not even cheating their classmates, since every person who enrolls in a college course gains from it as much as she or he individually puts into it. Why would you pay for something and then waste your time and energy on it? Is it arrogance—are they so smart they think they don’t need to be bothered?

When I was a kid, I was too terrorized to do this kind of thing. I would get caught (for sure!), and then I would be thrown out of school. My mother would weep and my father would disown me. I would spend the rest of my life in abject disgrace. So socialized was I to believe that you could not get away with cheating, lying, stealing, embezzling, arson, or murder that it wasn’t until I reached my mid-40s that I began to realize how much people do get away with. It was about then that I met a young woman who had spent a fair amount of her adult life committing insurance fraud.

She was minting money and new cars. Even whole new houses—twice she got insurance companies to tear out and rebuild the interiors of entire dwellings! That was an eye-opener.

By then I was on a university faculty. Informed by my young friend’s revelations, I began to notice the number of colleagues who pretended to serve on committees. They’d show up (sometimes) at meetings, do exactly nothing, and at the end of the day take credit for the work two or three other people on the committee actually did.

Should I mention the associate dean who arrived at his elevated position (and salary) on the strength of a three-volume magnum opus? When you opened the covers, as apparently few of his colleagues ever did, you discovered it consisted of offprints from the Congressional Record! Yes. In three volumes, the only parts he’d written were a short introduction and a series of two- or three-paragraph headnotes: maybe 35 or 40 pages in total.

How about the associate professor who was asked, three years running, to write a proposal to establish a program for which funding and administrative intent already existed and who never could manage to choke out anything acceptable, and how the program didn’t happen until a certain non-tenure-track lecturer of your acquaintance sat down and wrote the damn thing?

The search committee that was determined to hire a minority to its faculty, even though they openly admitted that a WASP woman was by far the best of the applicants? When the single African-American applicant accepted a job elsewhere, they closed the search rather than hire a better-qualified white candidate, and they conspired to flamboozle the Affirmative Action office with a set of phony reasons for rejecting her.

Dishonesty and cheating and devil-take-the-hindmost ethics are endemic to our culture, from the kid who pastes a web page into a term paper to the merchant who sells second-rate goods at first-rate prices to the manufacturer who fills “NEW!” packaging with less product at the same price to the pharmaceutical industries that foist unnecessary and even harmful drugs on “patients” who shouldn’t even be patients to bankers who entrap borrowers in loans everyone knows they can’t repay to crusading politicians who think the end justifies the means to presidents who lie to get us into unjust wars.

No. It’s not because they’re arrogant that the cleverest students cheat. It’s because they’re smarter than I was at their age. They’ve already learned they can get away with it, because everyone gets away with it. It’s the thing to do.

That is why I hate teaching. It is, in a word, profoundly demoralizing.

Big Job…

MIA for a few days because we picked up a nice contract job from the community college district, editing an application for a large and prestigious award. As with any document written by committee (don’t know why that always happens), we started with the deadline practically on top of us. It was about 25 or 30 pages long, and our job was to edit it, turn the bureaucratese into English, and make it sound like it was written by one person.

IMHO, it turned out pretty well. If it goes over exceptionally well, the college where I teach will win a grant of about a million dollars.

That would require some serious exceptional. The school was invited to apply for this award, along with about 115 other colleges. I think they have a shot of at least being recognized for the excellence of several of their programs. Given the difficulties community colleges face under the best of circumstances—serving an absurdly diverse constituency whose motives are so various and many of whom are unprepared for college-level work, while funding is precarious and a perverse legislature labors to undermine education across the state—this particular school does an amazing job of keeping young people in school, delivering vocational programs that at least have a shot of getting them into decently paying work, and funneling a fair number of them into four-year colleges.

Anyway, we got paid decently—not quite what we regard as our natural due, but we’re willing to come down on our hourly rate for nonprofit organizations. And we are so thrilled to work with someone who does not try to persuade us that the red rocks of Sedona were put there, coded with a secret message for humanity, by the same space aliens who built the pyramids.

We have another large, interesting job coming up the pike, a third materializing on the horizon (we hope), and an application for a fourth winging toward a business publication’s editorial board.

This is the sort of work we want to get. We are both royally tired of working for outfits that think we should provide professional-quality work for graduate-student pay, with trying to humor wannabe writers who think their self-published memoirs and amateur novels will inevitably be best-sellers, and with folks who commune with the dead and theorize about conspiracies.

We’re now officially registered contractors for the Maricopa County Community College District, one of the largest college districts in the country. This summer I hope we can engage a few strategies to keep us moving in the right direction:

• Join the Small Business Administration and start networking through that agency
• Learn, through the SBA, how to apply for federal contracts
• Look in to applying for state contracts
• Engage with the college district’s Small Business Center, which offers one-on-one consulting plus networking opportunities
• Join one of the chambers of commerce or start attending groups listed in Networking Phoenix

That ought to keep us busy this summer, especially given that I have a class to teach and Tina is transitioning from a paid employee of the Great Desert University to a contract employee for the Chinese government.

And speaking of busy, it’s after 6:00 a.m. Gotta run!

Proud to Be Laid Off… A job to feel well rid of

Every now and again, Lady Karma smirks. While we already know that the state of Arizona, with its wacko politicians and bizarre customs, is the perennial laughing-stock of the nation and steady supplier of Supreme Court cases, we occasionally forget how ludicrous its “educational” system is. Could the Great Desert University possibly out-do its administration’s pronouncement that the first African-American President of the United States did not have a “body of work” deserving of an honorary degree, unlike, say, Steve Allen (1982), Eddie Basha (1999), and the renowned Delbert Ray Lewis (2001)?

Well.

Yes.

Once again GDU makes its hundreds of laid-off former employees proud to be…former. Emphasis on former.

One of the university’s many teapot tempests, one that’s been brewing for quite a while, recently came to the attention of local news media, whose avatars were amazed to discover not only that a distinguished historian allegedly plagiarized with élan in his spoken as well as his published works, but that the administration overrode his tenure committee’s decision to deny a promotion to full on the basis of their view that his treatment of his unacknowledged sources (among them, we’re told, Wikipedia) amounted to plagiarism.

There’s a backstory that I’m not going to detail here, because I haven’t been directly privy to it and doubt that I could get faculty to confirm it on the record. However, the hilarity has begun. Now, if someone would please let Jon Stewart know about this…?

GDU: Defining Ugly

 

Image: Wells Fargo Arena. YF12s. Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Generic license.

Jobs: Out of the Frying Pan

Yesterday I used my faculty tuition waiver to sign up for one of the two courses required to get a real estate license. Well…two and a half—there’s a half-unit thing on contracts you have to take before you can sit for the exam. As soon as I can get through them and get a Realtor’s license, I’m going to try to find a part-time  job as a gofer in a real estate office.

I’m not interested in selling houses—don’t think I would be good at sales. What I’d like to do is help a successful sales agent with the behind-the-scenes stuff: filling out paperwork, filing, answering the phones, keeping track of appointments. My friend who is a very successful agent tells me that state law requires anyone working in a real estate office, no matter what the job, to be licensed. He says the courses are very easy and even kind of interesting.

Thanks to the waiver, a three-credit course costs me $15. Not a bad little lagniappe: resident tuition at the community colleges here is $75/credit hour. So all-told the underpaid teaching gig should save me about $445.

It’s a pain to have to change course this late in life. However, there’s no question in my mind that sooner or later our bat-brained legislators are going to succeed in making it legal to tote a gun onto the campus. And that is just beyond the pale: no way am I going to stand up in front of a classroom not knowing which and how many students, some of whom are even crazier than the local politicians, have pistols in their backpacks and purses. That is just simply unacceptable.

These courses are offered in short sessions, so I with any luck I should complete them by the end of this summer or, at the latest, by the middle of fall semester.

I figure a 50% FTE job as an underling in a Realtor’s office can’t possibly pay much less than I’m earning teaching in the colleges, and the salary would come in 50 or 52 weeks a year. The business of getting paid eight out of twelve months—when in fact you’re filling your summer and winter breaks with unpaid course-prep work—is for the birds.

Actually, if I did sell houses I might earn as much as I do teaching without putting in a lot more than 20 hours a week. A real estate agent has to split his or her sales commission with the broker and the agency: that is, on a 6% commission, the selling agent gets 3% and then has to fork over half of that again, finally pocketing around 1.5%. So, on the sale of a $200,000 house, you’d make around $3,000 (from which you’re paying the cost of continuing ed, wear and tear on your car, phone service, etc.).

Well. At that rate I would have to sell 5.6 $200,000 houses to earn what I make if I carry the maximum load allowable for adjunct faculty.

That probably isn’t an unreasonable goal, even for a newbie.

At least this will give me a back-up plan. I’d continue to teach the online magazine writing course, if the chair agrees. But I am not going into a classroom full of armed eighteen-year-olds and nutcases.

Welcome to class!

Image: Semiautomatic pistol. Yaf. Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license

Check Out My New Blog!

As if I didn’t have enough on my plate, I decided it would be fun (and maybe someday profitable) to start a new blog in which to vent and rave about my teaching adventures. Called Adjunctorium, it just went live in WordPress.com.

This’ll be the beta version. If it goes over reasonably well after, say, three or four months, then I’ll move it over to BlueHost so as to monetize it a bit.

Go on over and check it out! Lemme know if it looks promising.

Accursed Computers, Bizarre Lesson Plans

I have GOT to buy a new desktop!!!!!!!!!!!

The iMac has virtually ground to a stop, so antiquated is it and so clogged with whatever built-in obsolescence bugs cause old computers to slide toward entropy. I’ll bet I’ve sat here watching it choke and struggle as it trudges along for a good hour. And god how i hate having my time wasted this way!

One mistake, and you’ve got to do it all over again, and it takes ten minutes just to get the program you need to reload. I’ve been trying to build this semester’s course packet from a number of PDFs for the past goddamn HOUR—the job should have taken all of ten minutes at the outside.

I may just have to give up. Now I can’t get the damn computer to respond at all.

Spent the entire day yesterday, yea verily until 12:30 this morning, revamping the website and rewriting course materials, using the much zippier MacBook. Along the way, I learned that the newer versions of Apple’s “Preview” program will manipulate PDFs with as much or more panache than my decrepit version of Acrobat Professional. This is good: it means I don’t need to buy a new version anytime soon. Acrobat is an expensive piece of software for people who earn $2400 a semester.

However, the data I need—and there’s a lot of it—is on the old computer, which is the only one that will speak to the printer. And that terminal is too old to support any fancy new Mac operating systems.

Welp, the actual work of this semester’s 102 sections is hugely simplified. When it comes to serious grading, I’ve about halved the workload:

• Eliminated all but one draft
• Killed off all peer reviews
• Thereby quashed the need to have students interact online through blog comments or forums
• Found videos to substitute for lectures
• Assigned oral progress reports at three points during the semester
• Gave students deadlines for the library labs, after which they get no credit for attending
• Required one-on-one conferences at the end of the semester, for the 2,500-word research paper that’s such a monster for most of them

In fact, I’ll only have to grade three sets of papers and one draft. The rest of the stuff will entail my sitting back and watching them perform.

The result of assigning rafts of busywork is, as usual, that a student would have to be brain-dead or AWOL all semester to fail the course. If you scored 50% on each of the three actual papers but religiously performed all the busywork and extra credit, you’d end up with a final score of 69%. This means a student could get a D (60% to 69%) on any of the three real assignments, fail the other two, and still potentially pass the course with a C.

As a practical matter, students who fail the essays don’t do all the other assignments. But in theory it could happen.

I don’t know how to interpret that. On the one hand, it’s deeply demoralizing: to get our students to pass a dumb-bell course like freshman comp (which should be, shall we say, minimally challenging no matter what the instructor chose to do with it), we have to pack the thing with mickeymouse bullshit. But if we choose not to do that, at least half the students will fail or drop, and that seems counterproductive, too.

Truth to tell, I have tried to build some rigor into this semester’s course. They’re going to be terrified when they learn they have to write on topics of my choice on a subject of my choice: Prohibition & the Great Depression. Their paper topics are already assigned (I’ve dreamed up  more than enough to cover all three papers for all 50 students), and they will hate it, hate it, hate it that they can’t recycle the sappy post-adolescent maunderings that got them As and Bs in their high-school social studies and English classes.

The semester will begin with the proposition that writing is a tool for learning: that we write research papers so we can learn things and communicate what we learn to others. And this semester we’re going to learn about a period in American history that has great relevance to our own times.

In addition to writing three researched and documented papers on some pretty bracing topics, they will also make three oral presentations (one of them 15 to 20 minutes long) describing what they have learned along the way. This, I hope, will force at least some of them to reflect on and synthesize some of the stuff they encounter as they wade their way through the shoals of early twentieth-century history.

Exterminating the drafts and peer review works to a secondary advantage: now exactly zero student interaction will happen on my external website. All that will appear there will be the course materials, weekly learning modules, and an interminable list of links. This should overcome any objection the District may have to off-network sites. There’s no way any interchange (licit or illicit) between student and faculty can occur; nothing that is graded appears there; and nothing that could even remotely offend FERPA can happen there.

God. It’s after noon. I’ve spent half the morning watching stupid little mandalas spin. WordPress.com kicked me off and now I can’t get back in. DamNATION!

And now that it’s finally let me back online after three tries, the damn thing has lost page content I entered and saved earlier this morning. Now I have to do that ALL OVER AGAIN!!!!!!! What ELSE has it deleted?

Time to feed the dog and then drive down to the Safeway and pick up a bottle of bourbon. This wagon isn’t goin’ where I wanna go!