Coffee heat rising

Blogging: Something’s gotta give

The iMac’s wireless rodent ran out of gas the other day, and I didn’t have any AA batteries laying around the house. Instead of running forthwith down to the corner store to buy new batteries, I made a deliberate decision to leave the computer off.

This is something I need to do every day: leave the computer off. Maybe more of us need to do that.

Don’t know about you, but I spend way, way too much time in front of computer monitors, to the detriment of  health, social life, and the general sanitation of my home. So mesmerizing is this thing that whenever I sit down in front of a computer—doesn’t much matter what for—I go into a kind of hypnotic state, losing track of the time and losing track of conscious existence. I don’t hear what’s going on around me and I don’t think about what’s going on around me. That’s how I came to destroy not one but two expensive pieces of cookware (and have on occasion been damned lucky not to set fire to the kitchen). I depend on the Internet for news, encyclopedia information, medical advice, teaching tools, social interaction…and it has expanded to take over my life.

Like the Borg, it has assimilated me.

Between this phenomenon and the fact that the rib injury has hurt so much I could hardly move, by last Friday my house had come to rival a pigsty in its spectacular filth. All 1860 square feet of tile floors felt gritty underfoot. The kitchen floor was getting sticky as well as unsightly. The stovetop was encrusted with grease. The kitchen and bathrooms hadn’t been cleaned in weeks. Outdoors, plants were dying for lack of water, the garden had gone to seed, suckers were growing like green scrub-brush bristles all over the desert willow and the yellow oleander. Harvey the Hayward Pool Cleaner’s in-line leaf-catcher was so stuffed with debris the system was dying of entropy. And on Thursday a fellow member of our business group, showing off his brand-new iPad, snapped a photo of us all: I was sitting there with my head thrust forward and a dopey look on my face, just as I must look while parked in front of a computer monitor.

This. has. got. to. stop.

Friday’s post was written on Thursday night. So, on Friday when the iMac went incommunicado, instead of rescuing it, I pulled the suckers off the desert willow and then spent the entire day cleaning house. Did the laundry; washed the sheets; changed the bed. So far behind on these chores was I that catching up required an entire day.

That evening I used the MacBook to view current episodes of Rachel Maddow and The Daily Show, during which time I soaked, oiled and manicured my skaggy, neglected toenails and fingernails. Saturday: cleaned and vacuumed the filthy car, cleaned out the garage, read assignments from the online students. Rode my bike around the neighborhood. Sunday: cleaned out the pool equipment, scrubbed down the grease-soaked barbecue, pulled the dead and dying plants out of the garden, started to trim some of the frosted branches off the cape honeysuckle and the bougainvillea, rode my bike into a different neighborhood and along a stretch of canal bank. Ironed four weeks’ worth of jeans and shirts. Watched last week’s episode of PBS’s Masterpiece on the MacBook and this week’s off the air, again manicuring the exhausted fingernails with shea butter.

A weekend away from the computer left me feeling…well, I was left with quite a few thoughts.

• I need to limit the time I spend in front of the computer.
• I’ve got to keep up with housework, yardwork, and basic personal grooming.
• I need to get a social life.
• I need to get more exercise.
• I must re-evaluate why I am writing this blog and whether I should continue writing it at all.

While all this was going on, a flurry of anguished e-mails hit the message board of the blogger’s group I belong to. One of our members was undergoing a similar crisis of confidence. She reported that she had run out of ideas for posts, and that…yes! She was simply spending too much time in a trance-like state in front of the computer monitor!

She was expressing exactly what had been going through my own mind.

Why blog at all? Why did I start blogging, and how did FaM morph from an obscure diary to…to whatever the hell it is?

When I was a teenaged girl, I started writing a daily journal. That’s how I became a fairly skilled writer: practice makes perfect. On and off over the past 50 years, I’ve written something almost every day.

Four or five years ago, wearied of constant virus hassles and endless Microsoft patching and updates, I bought a Macintosh. A program called iLife came with the Mac. Among other things, this program makes it possible for users to write blogs and store them in Apple’s cloudlike server space, now dubbed ME.com. When I found this after I bought the iMac, it occurred to me that instead of filling up notebook after notebook, I could write journal entries digitally.

Too, I’d heard of “blogs” and wondered if I could write one. Somehow I’d stumbled across Trent Hamm’s The Simple Dollar, and so (monkey see, monkey do!) I decided to try my hand at a personal finance blog—heavier on the personal than on the finance. It really never occurred to me that anyone would read it. Nor did I especially intend for anyone to read it, any more than I intended for anyone to read my daily journals.

The iLife system is pretty limited. Its blog function apparently was intended for people who want to post photos of the kids for the grandparents to view, and not for serious blogging. This was fine by me, because at the outset it was strictly a hobby. And so I was astonished to discover that somewhere out there, people actually were reading my maunderings.

Belatedly, I moved FaM to WordPress.com. There it remained pretty much an idle hobby, but because of WordPress’s broad functionality, the blog grew in reach and readership. I continued to write every day, only because that’s what I do. But over time I began to craft posts more carefully and to try to focus the blog more specifically on PF how-to’s and advice.

At the urging of new blogging friends, I decided to move FaM to Bluehost so I could monetize it. This occurred with the help of Mrs. Micah, who at the time was running BlogCrafted, the website consultancy she had started. FaM soon started to earn money. Not much, but something.

This development changed the drift of what I was writing, because of course it changed the enterprise’s underlying mission. Instead of writing for the hell of writing—a kind of busman’s holiday—now I was again writing for pay. This meant I had to focus more sharply on personal finance issues and try (at least on occasion) to write for the widest possible readership. And I also had to spend a lot more time on SEO and various efforts to publicize the blog.

Doing anything for money tends to sap the fun out of it. Instead of entertainment, it morphs into a job. Now I was spending one to three hours a day (often more than that) at work: on top of a real paying job and on top of trying to run a side business. True, the blog also served as a podium from which to vent about that paying job and about my blessedly former employer, the Great Desert University. But still, blogging had become a job.

Today FaM has almost 500 subscribers, plus an unknown number who, like me, do not subscribe to blogs but manually revisit a specific set of favorites. It averages about 14,760 unique visits a month. So far this year it’s already had over 1.3 million hits. People all over the planet are reading this thing. As one-man bands go, it seems to be moderately successful.

With this small success has come a steady flow of “offers” from would-be advertisers. Most of them—a good 99.99% of them—are pretty sleazy: payday loan operators and loan consolidators. Many of them do not try to do business with me directly, but instead hire wannabe freelance writers, who seem to be ignorant of the implications of what they’re doing, to offer me FREE! guest posts laced with paid links. Others wish to pay me to write posts similarly laced with said paid links.

Paid text links violate Google’s terms of service. They put a site at risk of losing its page rank, the very quality that makes advertisers wish to place paid links on your site. You can get around this risk by entering code that makes their links “no-follow” links, which, as I understand it, tells search engines to ignore them. This conflicts with the text-link peddler’s motive, and so most of the time when you tell them you’ll publish only no-follow links, they back off.

I’m sure FaM could make a lot of money selling space to these shady operators. Briefly. As soon as Google knocked out my page rank, however, the text-link crowd would move to some other sucker’s site, and FaM’s AdSense income would tank.

Practicalities aside, fake “guest posts” whose sole purpose is to plant advertisements masquerading as helpful links are unethical. They misrepresent themselves and your blog to your readers. Like print advertorials, they pretend to be something they are not.

So, I made a conscious decision not to sell space for paid text links, and never to accept guest posts from people I don’t know or to run do-follow links to any commercial sites. This includes all the Amazon Associate ads that run on FaM: they all have been converted to no-follow links.

I seriously considered demonetizing Funny altogether. Adsense clutters up the site, makes it look junky. And it doesn’t earn much: despite continuing growth in traffic, revenues have dropped from around $200 to about $150 a month. On the other hand, it does supplement revenues from editing, and over the course of a year accrues enough to buy, say, a new iMac. So I’ve decided to leave Adsense in place for the nonce. If our proposed new client materializes this summer and actually pays enough to matter, I’ll revisit that decision.

So. Given that the site never will earn enough to substitute for a day job, I need to decide what to do to bring the endless time consumption under control. Here’s how I think I should start:

• First, quit posting every day. Cut the number of published posts from seven a week to three or four. At the very least, never post on weekends, when readership drops drastically.

• Next, do not write the first thing in the morning. Instead, take the dog for a walk and then launch into normal human activities. Write posts in the evening, after more useful pursuits have been accomplished.

• Mine student papers for guest posts. Each assignment elicits several interesting, well written pieces from the feature writing students. At the end of each semester, assess these and ask the best writers if they would like to publish one or more articles on FaM.

• Stop submitting posts to blog carnivals every single week. This is time-consuming, and, because I enter any damnfool thing instead of limiting submissions to the best pieces, not very productive.

• Quit writing the “Moments of Fame” series. It is time-consuming to plow through three or four carnivals a week looking for the posts that might interest FaM readers and then writing blurbs for each of them. Instead, post a tag in each accepted submission, linking from that post directly back to the carnival that featured it.

• Remove the Alexa toolbar from Firefox and never think about it again.

• Revisit the advertising question later, after this scheme has a chance to create some breathing space. Then consider other ways to monetize FaM…or whether to demonetize it altogether.

Tomorrow—assuming I post tomorrow—Funny’s 1,500th post will go live. If not tomorrow, this certainly will happen sometime in the next few days. It’s a milepost! A good time to rethink.

Image: Macbook on a Wooden Table. Jeff Geerling. Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.

Here and There around the Web

Are you ready for this one? It’s huge. Over at Surviving and Thriving, Donna Freedman is celebrating her one-year blogiversary by running amok with the giveaways. Donna, as we all know, is already the giveaway queen. Last week she sent me a copy of Personal Investing: The Missing Manual , a widely admired guide to retirement planning and investing, and she threw in a wacky calendar adorned with Alaskan moose photos—just for doing what comes naturally, posting a comment on one of her articles.

To mark her one-year blogging anniversary, Donna is giving away not one, not two, nay not even three gifts, but twenty-one of them. What can you hope for? Well, she’s offering…

A $100 Amazon.com gift card
Three $25 Amazon.com gift cards
A $25 Barnes & Noble gift card
An entire coffee-lover’s package that includes two pounds of fancy coffee, a Mr. Coffee café frappe machine, and two Savings.com coffee mugs
A subscription to All You magazine
An EnviTote folding canvas tote bag
Two copies of Wisebread’s 10,001 Ways to Live Large on a Small Budget
Two of Liz Pulliam West’s books, Your Credit Score, Your Money, and What’s at Stake(five copies) and Easy Money: How to Simplify Your Life and Get What You Want out of Life (two copies)
Carol Host and Peter Whybrow’s Get Satisfied: How Twenty People Like You Found the Satisfaction of Enough
Malcolm Gladwell,’s Outliers: The Story of Success
Dana Stabenow’s latest Kate Shugak novel, Though Not Dead

Donna points out that even if you don’t shop at Amazon or B&N, you can sell these cards on the secondary market. Same is true, I expect of any of the other goodies. But who would want to part with them?

Another extravagant giveaway is going on at Stoopid Success: try one or all of the 14 ways to enter the $300 giveaway slated for May 15.

The Outlier Model just moved off WordPress.com, launching a self-hosted site with a classy new design.

Boomer and Echo got an offer on their house and accepted it. They had to agonize a bit, but it looks like this was a smart decision.

Interesting article over at Canadian Finance Blog: Tom explains all those rules of thumb we’re supposed to apply to figuring out how much to save for retirement. Hmmm… Read all the way down through this post and you’ll see how much a typical Canadian can expect to receive from their equivalent of Social Security. Don’t hear any screaming about how their system’s going broke or how it’s time to short the old folks, and this is a far cry from the pittance Yanks receive… D’you suppose their legislators refrained from raiding those funds? Naaahhh….couldn’t be. Could it?

At Grumpy Rumblings of the Untenured, NicoleandMaggie get a great string of comments going about breaking our addictions.

Check out these posts from my friends in Money Sisters:

Save Money on Food, from Mrs. Money at Ultimate Money Blog
Bargain Babe has found a deal for free prescription glasses!
At Money Crush, Jackie reflects on money and contentment.
The Digerati Life hosts an entertaining piece by guest blogger Cap on fighting the urge to splurge.
Struggling with a new round of tough times, Mrs. Accountability discovers a treasure trove of fresh veggies at bargain prices.

 

Sticker Shock at the Grocery Store!

So after class yesterday I made a quick run on the Safeway, figuring to pick up enough to tide me over for a week. Not figuring to damn near faint dead away at the price of groceries!

Paid $60 for about $30 worth of food. Only food: no cleaning goods, no paper goods, no personal products, no wine, no beer, no coffee, no tea, none of that. The checkout guy was actually about to charge me $80, until I produced the Safeway red card, by which Safeway promises to give me a fair price in exchange for the personal disinformation I enter on an application form. We could say, actually, that Safeway charged my deceased German shepherd, whose telephone number (oddly enough) is the same as that of Safeway’s regional headquarters, a mere $60 for $30 worth of food.

Two and a half bucks for a head of romaine. Yea, verily, $2.50 for a head of any kind of leaf lettuce, including the pricey hydroponic stuff! After some cogitation, I realized that a large package of prewashed baby lettuce was cheaper by the ounce than a tough old head of clean-it-and-cut-it-yourself romaine. A dollar sixty-nine for a pound of apples (I got one, count it, (1), Jonagold apple at a bargain price of $1.49.

For Cassie, I found chicken hindquarters at 99 cents/pound, no “EXTREME VALUE!” since they’re full of bones. I’ll use the bones to make stock, of course. But still… Also got a package of “EXTREME VALUE!” boned pork for $1.59 a pound. These were the two cheapest items on the meat counters.

The pork, actually, looks pretty nice: it’s good and lean. Tonight I’ll cook it all up, have some of it for myself, and cut up the rest for Her Dogship. These two packages should last her about ten or twelve days. Assuming I refrain from eating much of it.

What sixty bucks bought was…

1 box of lettuce (large!)
1 bag frozen spinach
1 bag frozen mixed veggies
1 bag frozen bean/veggie/rice mixture
1 pound bacon
1 bunch fresh asparagus, about a pound
1 bunch green onions
1 head cabbage
3 bananas
1 cucumber
1 apple
32 ounces plain yoghurt
4.4 pounds pork
4.9 pounds chicken
1 package baking chocolate

Exclusive of meat for the Queen of the Funny Farm, this stuff is gonna last about a week or ten days, with luck. I have some fish and a couple small pieces of steak in the freezer, a lot of beans on the shelves, and enough cleaning supplies and toilet paper to last six months. If I don’t buy any more bacon this month, I might manage to go as much as two weeks without another grocery-store run. But I seriously doubt it.

My plan for this budget cycle is to wait until about two days before the cycle ends before making the monthly Costco run. Normally, I raid the Costco in the first day or two of the budget cycle. Because I’m about out of food and household supplies by then, I often spend upwards of $250 on this junket. Invariably some unexpected zap occurs shortly after that, making it difficult or impossible to stay on budget for the rest of the month. What I’d like to do this time is scrape along until the end of the month and then head for Costco, knowing at that time how much remains in the budget to spend. Otherwise, don’t go into Costco at all.

The theory, such as it is, proposes that one may be less likely to run out of money at the end of the month if one holds off on large routine shopping trips until the close of the budget cycle.

Now, it remains to be seen how well this theory does when tested by reality. However, I think I can eat out of the freezer and from relatively inexpensive purchases until pretty close to the ending day of this month’s budget cycle, which will be May 20. Today is April 28, a week into the current month, and this is the first grocery purchase I’ve made. Two more supermarket junkets would carry me through to the proposed month-end Costco run.

An end-cycle Costco spree would stock the larder for a good two to three weeks, delaying the need for much grocery shopping until more than halfway through next month. Thus that retiming of the Costco run could set me up to save a little on groceries, because I’d make fewer trips to supermarkets than I’m having to do this month. The problem is, I’ll be very surprised if, in a month when housekeeping supplies run low, it would be possible to stay much under $380 at Costco.

Just now I have $501 left in the cycle that started April 21. Assuming the two projected grocery-store trips also cost around $60 apiece, I spend another $55 or $60 on gasoline, I don’t get my hair done, I don’t go out to eat, and no little surprises pop up, that should leave around $321 for the proposed May Costco raid.

Sounds like a lot, eh? But last month I spent $362.10 at Costco, not counting the gas purchases. The previous month: $394.70. The month before that: $399.43. So, if that expenditure drops to $321, it’ll be a noticeable improvement.

Can it be done? Sure, if I don’t buy any booze. I buy almost all my wine at Costco; by the time you factor in a tax rate of almost 10 percent, that comes to around fifty bucks a month.

$362 – 50 = $312

Well within the desired range.

😀

If you don’t want to spend money in stores, stay out of stores!

Image: Store aisle. No artist given. Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License.

Noodling Around: 5 reasons why I prefer a (Mac)/(PC)

Infographics! I love them for their sheer sassy silliness. Here’s an entertainment I ran across on Mashable: Mac vs. PC People. Herein we learn that Macinoids are likely to be older than PC lovers; PC enthusiasts are more likely to live in the suburbs than Mac cultists, Mac fans like modern art while PCites prefer impressionism, and on and amusingly on.

What’s your preference? And how do your other preferences, lifestyle attributes, and personal quirks align with the alleged characteristics described at Mashable?

Pour moi, I prefer the Mac for some of its traits and the PC for others. Wish we could have a computer called, say, the Wallaby, that would blend them both.

{love!}

What’s so great about the Mac?

• Customer service. The world’s most awesome customer service!

• Fewer virus issues. Daring Mac aviators sometimes even fly naked: no virus software at-tall.

• Fewer crashes. Many fewer crashes.

• Fewer update hassles. It just does its thing. And when Apple publishes an update, it rarely requires a vast learning curve.

• Classy style. Oh, I love the look of the beautiful minimalist iMac!

OMG! It changed my life!

And what do I love about the PC?

• Speed. I think the PC runs faster than the Mac, especially for multitasking. A Mac really, truly does not like you to run more than two or three programs at a time.

• Keyboard commands. Garrrrrhhhhh! Word for Mac is still relatively user-friendly compared to the PC versions with the accursed “ribbon.” BUT…all your beloved keyboard commands? The damn things are Mac system commands. Write macros at your peril. Basically, this means point-click-point-click-point-click-point-click ad infinitium nauseum. If you’re used to speeding things along with keyboard commands, making the switch to Word for Mac means a real cut in productivity.

• Cheaper. But…uhm…you get what you pay for.

• Compatibility. Most people have PCs. Some programs for the Mac, such as Quicken, don’t translate to the PC platform.

• Availability: Lines of buyers never stream out the purveyor’s door, wind around the building, and extend out into the parking lot.

Quirks? I live in the city (but wish I was back on the ranch), like impressionism and some modern art, can’t afford to throw parties, prefer real news (the Times) to play-nooz (USA Today), love Rachel Maddow, love Jon Stewart, and wouldn’t be caught dead on a Vespa.

Images:

Apple iMac. © Matthieu Riegler, CC-BY, Wikimedia Commons.
IBM PC 5150 with keyboard and green monochrome monitor (5151), running MS-DOS 5.0. Boffy b. GNU Free Documentation License.

 

The Economy: How Pessimistic Are We?

A gold brick

The other day we heard reports of widespread pessimism about the economy. Unemployment is dropping, the stock market is up, and the economy appears to be growing. But nevertheless, the number of Americans who think we’re headed for Hell on a skateboard has risen some 13 percent. The price of gold is shooting toward the stratosphere, supposedly because investors worldwide are losing faith in the dollar’s strength and because the person on the street is having to sell her earrings to pay her mortgage. Meanwhile, the value of residential real estate continues to plummet, the drop so extreme that it suspiciously resembles the dread double-dip. Experts say this will continue until foreclosures abate, another way of saying “no end in sight.”

Be scared. Be very scared.

It’s not surprising that gold bugs would scuttle for shelter under the gilded refrigerator after the startling threat by Standard & Poor to downgrade the United States’ credit rating if the politicos don’t quit squabbling and do something to repair the wounded economy. If I could afford some gold, I’d probably be squeezing under there with them. On the other hand, I’m not in any rush to pawn my earrings.

Let’s get real.

Yesterday, U.S. stocks ended at a three-year high, a sharp recovery from the drop after the S&P’s dire warning. The Wall Street Journal, hardly a bastion of liberal Pollyannism, attributes this to consumer optimism (!) and strong earnings by “industrial heavyweights.”

Elsewhere, observers suggest that the S&P’s pronouncement could work to improve the country’s debt outlook. A credit downgrade, if it happened, would erode investor confidence in U.S. companies worldwide. The one-in-three chance of such a disaster just might push the demagogues on both sides of the political aisle to set aside ideology long enough to work together to resolve the debt problem. In that case, treasury prices could rise as spending is cut and taxes are increased. And if a downgrade actually did happen, causing the stock market to drop around 6 or 8 percent, investors would flock to safer havens: government bonds.

It’s worth remembering, though, that the state of the national debt may not be as dire as we’re led to believe. Writing at TPM, Brian Beutler notes that by historical standards, the debt is nowhere near as desperate as people think, and he provides graphs to prove it. He points out that the problem we need to address is unemployment:

The Bureau of Labor Statistics provides the data that suggests Congress’s priorities are out of whack. Currently, civilian unemployment is higher than at any point in the post-war period save for a brief spike in the early 1980s when the Federal Reserve briefly used contractionary monetary policy to fight inflation. Already its clear that unemployment is falling much more slowly than it did in 1981. And when people get back to work, revenues will climb, and deficits will shrink on their own.

As for real estate, despite the Bloomberg report that puts Phoenix at the bottom of a declining market, an April market update based on Arizona MLS listings reveals that the total number of active listings has dropped and sales are up 26 percent over the past 30 days. The supply of homes on the market here is now down to what has traditionally been regarded as normal, a 3.8-month supply. Meanwhile, in another hard-hit real estate market, Florida’s Miami-Dade County, March sales are are up 84 percent over March 2010 sales, largely driven by foreign investors.

So, it would appear that pessimism is in the mind of the beholder.

Me, I’m feeling a great deal less grim than I felt at this time last year. As ill-paid as it is, work seems more abundant: despite skyrocketing food and fuel costs, eight sections of comp and writing courses at the community college will support me in the style to which I intend to remain accustomed, and if the budding new client relationship works out, The Copyeditor’s Desk will be set for quite awhile. The happy stock market has revived my retirement savings nicely. Despite the dismal loss on the downtown house and the drop in value in my own residence, my net worth is $21,660 more than it was in August of 2007.

How about you? Are you feeling better, worse, or pretty much the same about the economy, compared to your sentiments a year ago?

Hold the Phone, Here…

Waaaaitaminit! A few belated second thoughts about the pending dental adventure are occurring.

I’m driving down the road headed back from campus to the Funny Farm and thinking, “Good grief! Three thousand dollars is more than a fourth of the savings I’ve earmarked to supplement Social Security for the next year.  That ‘supplement’ represents half my month-to-month living allowance. So we’re talking about disappearing three months’ worth of money for living expenses.”

Furthermore, think I, the prospect of sitting in a dentist’s chair while the guy bangs away at my mouth for two hours sounds…well, counterproductive. As in a very, very bad idea.

Then it occurs to me to wonder whether two crowns are really necessary. Dr. Davis, he of the pricey parking lot, once opined that though the chipped crown on the bottom molar is unaesthetic, a) no one can see it unless I open my mouth in public and yawn like a hippopotamus, and b) it’s perfectly functional. As for the broken tooth on top, the new dentist polished the surface smooth, so that it doesn’t irritate my tongue (in fact, it irritates a lot less than it did after he filled the first break in it). It also seems to be perfectly functional. It doesn’t hurt, and since my teeth are already so dull I can’t chew up a normal bite-sized piece of meat, there’s no change in my ability to chew or eat. hmmm….

The light dawns...

INSIGHT!

If you can get a second opinion for a doctor’s diagnosis and you can get a second opinion for a veterinarian’s diagnosis, why the heck can’t you get a second opinion for a dentist’s recommendation?

If this tooth were so badly damaged it needed to be crowned, wouldn’t it hurt? Not very much of it broke off…certainly not a big chunk, as this guy described it. I would have noticed if a fourth of a large molar had fallen into the mouthful of rice and canned beans I was eating at the time. It says here that the stuff underneath the white enamel of your teeth is called dentin, that it’s yellow, and that if it’s exposed, what you get is sensitivity. I’ve been guzzling iced tea, bourbon on the rocks, and hot coffee for the past two days, with nary a twinge.

Bounce out of the car and into the house, grab the phone, and call Old Doc Davis’s office. Ask if he’ll see me. The receptionist whose head I nearly bit off the last time I was there is polite, if you can imagine. She arranges an appointment on Monday.

Grab a mirror and a flashlight. Take a real close look at that busted tooth. It’s white all over, just the way it looked in the digital image New Doc made of it. That is to say, it’s the same color and consistency of all the other teeth in my head. Pretty clearly, this guy doesn’t think there’s any urgency to crown it; otherwise, he wouldn’t have let his office assistant make an appointment at the end of May.

Maybe, just maybe, it doesn’t need to be crowned at all. Or, if it does, maybe there’s no reason to remove the old crown on the bottom tooth and change that out. And even if that is necessary, maybe it doesn’t have to be done in one long torture session.

And if I really do need two crowns, maybe Davis will do them cheaper.

We shall see.

Image: Chicago Skyline at Dawn. Joe M500.  Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.