It absolutely is a case of NIMBY. And it must be said that Not-In-My-Backyardism can indeed be seen as not very nice. Socially irresponsible. Elitist. Selfish. Racist. Classist. Agnostic to the Great God of Free Enterprise. But…
The situation is a little more nuanced than that.
Here’s the Situation as I understand it — and bear in mind that none of this has been confirmed. So far, I’ve heard it by word of mouth. Tomorrow, if I can get to the evening meeting at which the Situation will be explained, I’ll have the details from the mouth of one of the horses.
A house at the corner of Main Drag South and Feeder Street NW has been purchased by a nonprofit. Said property has been a problem house for about as long as I’ve lived here. Main Drag South is one of the most heavily traveled surface streets in the city; in fact, at one point the city planned to widen it (it’s already 7 lanes!), saying that it carried the most traffic of any of the city’s surface roads. The house fronts on Main Drag South. The noise and dirt from a street like that, needless to say, are ferocious. It’s not a place anyone would choose to live, if they could afford better.
It was a bit of a wreck for quite a while; I think it was probably a rental. Then came the Bubble. As prices were climbing, somebody bought the house, fixed it up, and lived in it for awhile. They sold it to someone who apparently figured out its drawbacks after the fact. They noticed, for example, that people trying to turn right at the interminable signal at Main Drag and Feeder would drive up on the lawn to get around cars stacked in front of them.
So they built a pony wall around the lot’s perimeter, which they stuccoed. They stuccoed the house, too, and painted both to match: in a hideous shade of mustard brit-shindle. Proudly, they installed a lawn and a semi-circular driveway. Except for the ugly color, the house looked pretty nice.
Then it rained.
They had neglected to install drain holes in their wall. And apparently they’d never heard of caliche.
The front yard turned into a lake. It filled high enough to flood the house. And…the water just sat there.
And sat there.
And sat there.
Eventually they had it pumped out. Somebody came in did some work, presumably repairing the damage. And the proud owners moved on.
Since then the mustard brit-shindle house has gotten a little shabby around the seams but otherwise has been inoffensive.
Now we’re told that the people who recently bought the place want to turn it into a homeless shelter.
Yeah. In our neighborhood. Right at the entryway to our neighborhood.
The Neighborhood Homeowner’s Private Club is up in arms. They’re urging everyone to show up at the zoning commission hearing to oppose the new owner’s scheme, which involves getting a variance so they can bulldoze the yard for a parking lot and erect an eleven-foot wall. The owners are holding a meeting with the neighbors tomorrow, presumably to plead their case for the poor.
Now, it has to be said that there are plenty of homeless people around here. Why, just last week, one or two of them revisited their favorite flophouse, the trash-can alcove outside my back gate, tossed their beer and liquor bottles around the alley, and left a great stinking mound of shit next to the gate, decorated with gummy toilet paper.
That’s our fellow humanity.
Central-city neighborhoods are always under a great deal of pressure. The city government itself, often (as ours is) owned by developers, invariably comes up with a scheme like a train or a double-decker freeway or whatnot that will enrich some One-Percenter at the expense of the people who live there. And centrally located middle-class neighborhoods are often bordered by dangerous slums — as this one happens to be.
I’ve been through this before. My ex- and I bought in the Encanto neighborhood just as it was starting to gentrify. It’s now one of the most sought-after neighborhoods in the Valley; what was then down-at-the-heels commerce around it has evolved into trendy shopping, business, and arts districts. At the time, we also had plenty of homeless folks living in the area, pushed out of downtown by the city’s enthusiastic redevelopment there.
None of these people were hapless victims of an economic crash. They were drug users and alcoholics. Not a few were seriously mentally ill men and women abandoned by closure of institutions that, whatever their failings, at least kept a roof over the heads of those incapable of caring for themselves. Some of these mentally ill folks, like some allegedly sane folks, were dangerous: one guy, for example, walked into a dirty-shirt law office on McDowell Road, where an early-bird admin assistant was making coffee for other staff who hadn’t shown up yet, and killed her for the fun of it. Others were just pests, the sort who would shit in your yard and climb into any unlocked car to take a nap.
Down the road, there was a homeless shelter. It would take people in at night, bed them down, and then at dawn would toss them back out on the street. With no place to go, the residents would ride the buses or hang out in the library all day, to keep cool or warm. Or they would wander up and down the streets of our neighborhood, all day long, until they could get back into the flophouse. There were always bums stumbling up and down our street, every day.
We could not let our son play outdoors without constant supervision. When he played outside with his little buddy who lived up the street, either I had to stand outside and watch them every minute, or our neighbor’s housekeeper had to do it. If I took him to the park — Encanto Park is a lovely, shady park in the middle of a historic neighborhood, with a pond and boats and playgrounds and a merry-go-round and it’s really very pleasant — yes, when I would go to the park with him, I would have to take our German shepherd. And yes, twice on those jaunts that German shepherd did her job. If I walked around the neighborhood alone, I would take the shepherd with me. And yes, several times she repelled attempted boarders.
Well, when you’re a boy child, you do reach a point in life where you don’t want your mommy or your nanny peering over your shoulder every living, breathing minute. That was why we moved out of the neighborhood.
So, as you can imagine, I feel a certain degree of empathy with the folks who don’t want this outfit to plop a homeless shelter in our neighborhood.
And I also feel some concern: all these young couples moving in here with their kids, fixing up the homes and making the neighborhood so much nicer and pushing up the property values are going to fly out of here like a flock of migrating ducks as soon as they discover they can’t let the kids play in the front yard for fear of some stoned, unwashed fright harassing them.
I like these young people. And I don’t want them scared out of here by a thoughtless scheme like this. If that’s NIMBY, then so be it.
As a practical matter, this area probably does need a homeless shelter: but not in the middle of an established, upwardly mobile neighborhood. The shelter needs to go in where the homeless people live, for godsake! That’s over on the other side of Conduit of Blight.
Conduit of Blight marks the eastern border of a swath of old, blighted cheaply built housing tracts that flanks the I-17 freeway and spreads westward for miles. (Yes, Virginia: right-to-work laws do foster the growth of poverty and slums.)
The canal about a half-mile to the north marks the southern border of a habitat for meth gangs.
Either district would benefit from a social service provider like this.
Put the thing in here, though, and what you’ll do is call the drug users, the wrecked alcoholics, and the impoverished mentally ill into our neighborhood: into our park, into our yards, into our alleys, and into our homes. (If you don’t think they burgle, you mis-think.)
So it would indeed make sense to buy a house and turn it into a homeless shelter. But for godsake, put it in an area where the people who need it already hang out.
That’s where we are right now. It’s NIMBY, all right. No, I do not want the homeless set in my backyard…again.
Image: By Josh Swieringa – Flickr, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=3270773
I’ve lived in Little Rock for most of my adult life and seen plenty of panhandlers and homeless people, so I understand where you’re coming from. Back in the 80’s, I was approached several times a month by older men in their 50’s, 60’s and probably older for bus fare to get back to Fort Roots, the VA hospital. They were always polite and humble, said “please” and “thank you”. Most of the time, I didn’t mind helping them.
Then sometime during the 90’s, a younger, more aggressive generation of panhandlers came in and my generosity dried up pretty quickly. Almost all of them came at me with an attitude of entitlement, hostility or both. I was grabbed in the parking lot of my apartment building by a man asking for money. I wasn’t physically harmed but it taught me not to interact with strange men when nobody else was around. Since then, I usually don’t even let them finish a sentence before I say “no” and I don’t break my stride. If that’s makes me a bad liberal, so be it.
One of them chased me around the parking lot at the neighborhood Albertson’s supermarket. That’s why I don’t shop there anymore. But at the fancy AJ’s, I had to run to catch up with a male employee by way of evading a guy who was walking around hassling women in the parking lot.
A student of mine at GDU was a police officer. She said never to give panhandlers money, because almost all of them are drug addicts. They take your money and snort it up their noses.
Seemingly confirming that, one of Ex-DH’s law partners, back in the day when we were young and tender, saw a guy panhandling by the side of a busy intersection with a “will work for food” sign (back when those were fashionable). The young lawyer was coming from a grocery store, so he handed a bag of groceries out the window to the guy. Glanced up in his rear-view mirror as he drove away to see the guy throwing it in the gutter.
Gonna second the motion on not giving pan handlers money. I was approached in the city some years back by pan handler and he told me he needed $ to buy food. I told him to come with me I would buy him lunch on the spot…he declined and said he’d rather have the cash….I declined and then he got pissed and called me an “A-Hole” and walked off……
As for the homeless shelter….GOOD LUCK….Seems to be a movement a foot to bring folks of modest means out to the “burbs” in this neck of the woods. The thought being they will benefit from “the rarified air in suburbia”…but I have witnessed these folks relocated with my tax dollars in the form of housing vouchers bringing “the old neighborhood” with them….drugs, gang-banging and all. Just read a book “$2 a day : living on almost nothing in America”…which gives an interesting take on the Welfare system and supposed reform that Bill Clinton pushed thru in the 90’s. After reading this I want to move to Canada…..
Yeah, I’m afraid it’s going to come under the heading of trying to fight City Hall.
That’s what happened when SDXB sold his house. At the time, the city was relocating the residents of a barrio so they could build a new runway for the airport.
The city had bought it for a couple they were “relocating” from this barrio. They’re reasonably pleasant people, but…it’s a cultural thing, I guess. They don’t seem to understand that a house is the same as money in the bank, and so you keep it up to maintain your investment. The place went to pot pretty quickly.
That area around there…my goodness. The ONLY word you can use for it is “Third World.” I have to go down there to the printer. Every time, I marvel: it’s hard to believe you’re really in the United States, so astonishing is the poverty.
It makes our nearby slums look affluent. Seriously.
Edin & Shaefer’s “$2 a Day” absolutely applies to a huge section of Phoenix south of the (now dry, heavily contaminated) riverbed. If you’ve ever been in the Middle East, Haiti, or even in parts of Mexico, you’ve seen exactly the kind of conditions people are living in down in South Phoenix. As they point out, for many blue-collar middle-class and working poor in this country, this kind of desperate poverty has happened BECAUSE JOBS HAVE BEEN MOVED OFF SHORE.
It’s no wonder people are mad enough to rally behind a raving crazy like Donald Trump.
Anyway. SDXB underpriced his house. It was the run-up to the bubble and prices were crazy — but he didn’t understand that. All he understood was we had just gone to court against the Perp, who threatened the judge and appeared to be a moderately bad actor. The Perp affair plus the rising taxes convinced him to move to Sun City. So he put the house on the market and it sold in less than 24 hours.
I don’t know. If they put this thing in, I guess I’ll have to revive my plans to move.
But the truth is, I can’t afford to move anyplace comparable to this place, unless it’s out to Sun City, a prospect that just makes me cringe. I DON’T want to live out there! But I surely can’t afford a house in town, or even a new house in the ‘burbs. I can’t even afford a condo in Scottsdale. Nor can I take Cassie to a condo or a patio home: she barks incessantly, and it’s just ear-piercing. I’d have to find another home for her, which wouldn’t be easy, especially given that she’s getting pretty elderly. I might have to have her put to sleep, if I couldn’t find anyone to take her.
Oh my goodness…don’t put Cassie to sleep….From all your stories about the dogs I feel like I know them. Like you, I’m attached to our elderly cat. Sadly our 17 year old male, one of the “youngsters”, is off his feed and is acting feeble. Last time that happened kidney failure was the culprit in another male we had….never good. HOPE he has the flu….That was a heck of a book and had me going from feeling sorry for the folks in it TO wanting to just shake them. One gal had like 13 kids and got like $1600 in food stamps that only lasted 2 weeks….crazy. The bad thing about the shelter is it becomes a gathering place even when it’s closed and no one is supposed to be there. And then you have cigarette butts, needles, beer and liquor bottles….Not a good development…
I don’t know what else I could do, if I were pushed into moving. If they put that thing in there, I’ll need to get out of here quickly, before property values start to drop again. But even with the current improved (inflated?) prices, what I can get for this house after a Realtor’s commission would not get me into an actual house anywhere else in the city where it’s reasonably safe to live. And there’s no way she can live in an apartment: she barks constantly.
Unless my son will take her, which I don’t think he will BECAUSE she barks constantly, I won’t have much choice. I’m not taking her back to the dog pound.
I think there’s NIMBY where people don’t want to be inconvenienced, and then there’s NIMBY where people don’t want parts of their lives destroyed. Clearly this is a case of the second one, and the fact that you’ve witnessed the path that this would go down has to be clearly terrifying. I hope that you take the opportunity to speak at the meetings. Your perspective of what WILL happen might ring louder than the voices that I’m sure will be there about what MIGHT happen. Good luck.
It doesn’t look like I’ll get to the thing tonight, where the owner is going to try to persuade the neighbors that this is a GOOD thing… I may have to try to get in to the city council meeting. How on earth I’ll get down there at 9 in the morning, I can’t imagine. I’d probably have to take the train, because there’s no place to park downtown that you can afford. That would mean leaving the house by 7 a.m., since it would take about an hour to get down there on the train and then I’d have to walk to City Hall. Wow! By the time I get home, it’ll absorb the most of the day.