Coffee heat rising

Ghost developments

Inflation-adjusted housing prices in the United States by state, 1998–2006. Click on the image for a larger view.

Yesterday I spent the afternoon hanging out with my friend Kathy, who lives up against the White Tank Mountains that form the Valley’s western boundary.

The far west and east sides of the Valley were the scenes of the most frantic building campaigns during the late, great Real Estate Bubble, whose collapse has affected the Phoenix area possibly more than any other major metropolis in the country. Phoenix, like Las Vegas (another hard-hit town), has a typically Southwestern boom-and-bust economy. Based on nothing solid, our spates of prosperity evaporate into the dry desert air at the first breath of a hard wind.

The west side has been filled with toss-’em-up tracts, styrofoam-and-stick houses that go off like Roman candles if a fire starts somewhere in the structure, that split and fall apart as the poorly compacted clay beneath them settles, and that stand eave-to-eave, crammed so close together that you might as well be living in an apartment as in one of the laughably dubbed “single-family homes.” Even the most expensive housing there is built this way: people packed in like hens in a commercial chicken farm.

These tracts are half empty. As housing prices ran up, new housing sold for even more than existing housing, which itself was selling for far more than what it was worth. As buyers defaulted, builders went belly-up, leaving many developments only partially built out and many houses standing empty.

Because the frantic building took place on the edges of the sprawl (Phoenix’s City Parents carefully study Los Angeles so they can imitate everything L.A. did wrong), the bust has affected the new areas far more than the central parts of the city.

I was amazed at what we saw as we drove around: mile on mile on mile of shiny new strip shopping  malls, all of them empty. One mall had a single Italian restaurant in it. Another had housed a couple of businesses that had closed and cleared out their equipment, while other space evidently had never been leased.

In one development, an empty mall had a dusty sign next to an empty bank building: “Citibank: Coming Soon!”

We went by a shoe store we both like, because it sells European styles that look nice on your feet without crushing your bones.

Gone.

By and large, the surviving commerce consists of big box stores, beauty salons and supply houses, and a few chain restaurants. Everything else is absent.

It’s eerie to drive through a vast area and see swaths of empty buildings. The place looks like an empty movie set. Or like it had been evacuated and the residents never returned.

Kathy was surprised when I said that our part of town has no empty shopping malls, and in fact centrally located strip malls are being renovated and are fully occupied. She has seen these ghost strip malls for so long, she’s come to think of them as a normal part of the landscape.

What a landscape it is! Vast Potemkin villages of ghost neighborhoods and ghost shopping malls. If this is going on all across the country, America is in deep trouble.

Image: “United States Housing Bubble,” Wikipedia. GNU Free Documentation License.

Die cast…

The interview at Glendale Community College went well. I think. But then…what do I know?

Their strategy is to hand you a C-level student paper and ask you to grade it in 15 minutes. Then they take a half hour during which you are to respond to six questions. So it’s a whirlwind trip that can’t possibly reveal very much about any one candidate other than how he combs his hair or whether she brushes her teeth.

A friend had clued me that Glendale prides itself on its high-tech pedagogy and that its leadership is committed to the Student Success Initiative, and so I had several related buzzwords on my tongue. Probably if I was weak on anything it was on pedagogical theory. I don’t do theory well. I teach by the seat of my pants. Generally I come out about where the theorists would like, but I don’t get there the same way.

So, we shall see.

We may see fairly soon: they’re hiring for January! We’re already a third of the way through November. They’ll have to select a hire soon, in order to get the person on the payroll by the time spring classes begin. Surely they’ll make a decision by the middle of December.

A whole flock of chickens

HondaInsight

Let’s count some chickens before they’re hatched!

Today I’m going to interview for a full-time teaching job at a nearby community college. The likelihood that they’ll hire me is about zero, but miracles happen. So I dare to daydream…

♣ If I get this job, the first thing I’m gunna do is buy some decent clothes. Years of living in Costco jeans have left me without any real clothes. No more than one or two outfits in the closet would do for an interview or for work in an office anywhere other than academia.

♣ The second thing I’m gunna do is hire someone to take care of the pool.

♣ Then I’m going to get a car that doesn’t guzzle $80 or $90 worth of gas every month.

♣ And forthwith, while housing prices are still depressed, I’m going to look for someplace to live that doesn’t have a swimming pool, two unused bedrooms, and a big yard to take care of.

♣ And next summer, I will put my beautiful little dog in the beautiful new sporty car and head for northern New Mexico, where we will see nary a 116-degree day through the entire month of July!

♣ County employees (the community colleges belong to the Maricopa County) share in the Arizona State Retirement System, a defined-benefits pension plan. I wonder if they therefore also get RASL? If that is the case, then instantly I get hired, my RASL would max out.

Yes. If I were paid my present salary on a nine-month basis, my hourly rate would jump from $30 an hour to about $85 an hour. Half of that times all my unused sick leave would come to $51,850. RASL maxes out at $30,000, so I would be well beyond that. I could actually use some of my sick leave without biting into that retirement benefit!

Mwha ha hah!

Nothing like a little wool-gathering to start your day...

Above the Clouds.  Arun Kulshreshtha.
Wikipedia Commons.
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States

Managing a large workload

Full-time faculty at the community colleges here teach five and five: five sections a semester. That is a huge workload, especially for English faculty, who teach almost nothing but composition courses. A few senior people manage to land survey of lit courses, but most are teaching comp and remedial sections.

It’s unlikely Glendale Community College will hire me into the full-time position for which I’m interviewing next week. But just in case… It might be good to know how one would handle a very workful job like that.

Writing courses, of which composition is a variant, are extremely work-intensive. Students learn by writing and by getting feedback from knowledgeable readers. This means you not only have to grade their opuses, you have to try to comment intelligently on them. It’s a tall order when you’re looking at 100 or more students. How can any human being possibly grade that many papers, week in and week out, without dying of overwork?

Just now I’m using rubrics—lists of criteria agreed upon by the instructor and the students—to grade their papers. The rubric strategy allows me to gloss over errors that are outside the assignment’s parameters, including some issues that, in earlier incarnations, I would have attacked. So: when one limits oneself strictly to a set of rubrics, how long does it take to grade a set of papers?

The Monday students at Paradise Valley turned in the final drafts of their second essays last week. I brought the kitchen timer into the study, and here was the result:

Difference between the mean and the average time required to grade the first 11 papers that I read was negligible. All in all, it takes about 19 minutes per 750-word paper, if you’re moving fast and not being too picky. Probably requires a little more, since I neglected to start the timer just as I started some of those papers. At about 20 minutes per paper, how long should it take to plow through an entire section’s Golden Words?

The District caps composition classes at 25, but as a practical matter quite a few students drop during the first few weeks, so sizes should average around 20. So six hours and 30 or 40 minutes is probably a reasonable estimate of the time it would take to grade one set of papers from one class

It doesn’t count count the many distractions and extra work-makers that interfere, however. While I read these papers, for example, my computer crashed twice; the phone rang several times; the dog pestered me now and again; my client sent a raft of new documents to read; the choir director asked me to write a few lines of copy; and several times I had to google students’  factoids and assertions, leading me to wander the labyrinths of the Internet. So the activity of grading can be pretty gestalt. There’s no way you could get 6 2/3 uninterrupted hours to just sit down and get the job done.

But let’s suppose the total amount of time required to read one raft of papers came to only 6.67 hours. An instructor can control the number of papers that arrive at a single time by a) refusing to accept late papers and b) staggering the classes’ due dates. If you were skilled at this, could you limit your workload to no more than 40 hours a week?

Interesting!

In theory, you could accept as many as four sets of papers in a week without having to put in a 50- or 60-hour work week.

In reality, of course, that’s outrageous. In the first place, full-time faculty do a lot more than teach: they’re involved in faculty governance; they tutor and advise students one-on-one; and they enjoy endless, mind-numbing meetings. So three rafts of papers are probably about as much as you could handle in a normal week—that assumes you’d only have about five hours of meetings, student conferences, and other activities, a conservative estimate.

If you could engineer things so that you never had more than two sets of papers due in a single week, about 30 hours of class time and grading time would leave plenty of hours for the rest of the shenanigans involved in a full-time teaching job and allow you to have your evenings and weekends to yourself. More or less.

The take-away message here, if there is one, is that if you have any control over the due dates of incoming work, you should be able to keep a fairly large workload within reasonable bounds. It relates to my earlier theme day idea: don’t regard all the work that comes pouring in as one huge mass that has to be done right this minute. Map out priorities for the work, identify due dates, and schedule or delay tasks out in front of you, fairly close to the times when they’re due.

The reason I felt theme days were not going to work is that I’d failed to break free of the feeling that everything has to be done right away. Faced with two rafts of papers, page proofs for a large and challenging publication, a steady tattoo of new documents to edit from a client, a mountain of laundry, a filthy house, parched house plants, a garden in need of attention, a pool ditto, and an especially busy choir week, I started to panic.

The truth is, though, not everything has to be done right now. Recognizing that fact and putting it to work for you can go a long way toward freeing you from workload oppression.

Median income, median savings?

Chug on over to Free Money Finance, where you’ll find an interesting article and discussion about some figures FMF has found, suggesting few Americans are ready for retirement. FMF is spinning off an article that dispenses advice on using your home equity to help finance retirement, but his attention is caught by some figures the authors refer to in passing. The passage he cites says this:

What’s more, the report noted the median value of financial assets is less than 1.5 times median income—$75,000— for the majority of middle-class households and that the median value of financial assets is just three times median income—$132,000—for the vast majority of affluent households. Read that report at this Web site.

The report indeed does suggest that most people have around 70 percent of their assets tied up in their homes.

Figures like these can’t tell us much until they’re correlated with age groups. It would help if we could know the median value of financial assets for people in their 20s, their 30s, their 40s, their 50s, and their 60s. Then we could have a reliable feeling for how many 80-year-olds will be competing with how many 20-somethings to find jobs greeting shoppers at the local Walmart.

Since we can expect young workers to have little or no savings, and since many workers of all ages live in right-to-work states where wages are low, a combined disproportion of young earners and lower-income older workers would work to push the median down, unless there were an equal number of very high income workers. And nationwide, I’ll bet there’s not, despite the widely publicized conspicuous consumption.

Also, take a look at the wording in this thing. It’s hard to tell what is being said:

The median value of financial assets is less than 1.5 times median income—$75,000—for the majority of middle-class households and that the median value of financial assets is just three times median income—$132,000—for the vast majority of affluent households.

Is the median income $75,000, or is that the median value of financial assets? Is $132,000 the median value of financial assets, or the median income for most affluent households? Probably, one would assume, it’s the median income…but how does $132,000 qualify as “affluent” for a household income? That would amount to two $66,000 incomes. Now, $66,000 is a helluva lot better than the $28,000 gross I’ll be living on post-layoff, but it isn’t a lot. In the large scheme of things it’s really just an average income—I get by on that amount now only because my house is paid off, I have no other debt, and I live frugally.

When you get into the PDF at the Society of Actuaries website, you see that the researchers do break their data down by age group, gender, marital status, and  alleged socioeconomic class. But the subjects’ ages range from 45 to 74; “retirement” is defined as the point at which “a household’s primary focus switches from accumulating assets to using those assets to supplement its income so as to maintain a desired standard of living.”  In other words, if you kept working full-time and simply stopped contributing to your 401(k) or other savings instruments, you could be considered “retired.” This category applies only to those in the 55- to 74-year-old range. Median incomes shown in these figures are surprisingly low: for single women in the 55- to 65-year-old bracket, it’s $28,000 (men do better at $41,000), and for women between 65 and 74 it’s $18,000 (men’s median income drops to $28,000). In the “middle-class” range, net worth for younger marrieds, single women, and single men (respectively) is $348,000, $111,000, and $125,000; for the older set, net worth figures drop to $285,000 for married couples but rise to $130,000 for both single men and single women (7). The report finds that a large part of these Americans’ net worth is invested in “nonfinancial assets,” which include not just real estate equity but also equity in small businesses, vehicles, collectibles, and art (15).

Well. A small business can return a nice bit of income, and depending on how the corporation is structured, it may or may not show up on your income taxes as earned income. Much of the income from my S-corporation, for example, will be realized as dividends. And owning your house free and clear is worth more than the face value of the dollars involved.

The value of my home represents 57% of my net worth. Because the house is paid for, I would say that its real value to me is significantly higher: every dollar that I don’t have to pay to keep a roof over my head is a dollar I can use to buy groceries. My son’s monthly payment on a house of similar value is $1,420: almost an entire paycheck (net) of my soon-to-be-former $65,500 salary. If I had to pay a mortgage on my home, I could not survive on Social Security and part-time work.

While my savings eventually will supplement those two pittances enough to keep me more firmly in the middle class, as a practical matter I’m having to delay draw-downs for a year, in hopes that the economy will recover enough to allow my devastated investments to come back to normal. If I didn’t have a paid-off place to live, I couldn’t afford to do that.

Life’s a little more complicated than these figures seem to suggest at first glance.

So this is retirement?

With retirement like this, who needs work?

I read student papers till 11:30 last night (the result of having loafed half the day before, if reading page proofs can be called loafing); leapt up at 6:00 a.m.; shot across the city with La Maya to an estate sale (nice stuff: too expensive); shot home, delivering edited page proofs to a publisher on the way; worked till class met; collected another mound of papers to add to the mound from the other class (yet to be read); shot back out to Scottsdale to a business reception; flew back; fed the dog; took the dog for a walk, wherein we witnessed the immediate aftermath of a three-fatality wreck (teenagers from the tenements across 19th Avenue); trudged home; sat down to write a few lines of copy I’d said I’d do on a volunteer basis for the choir director; listened to the clock tick while trying to figure out what to say (it ain’t easy to praise God when you’ve just seen the end of three kids); heard the Mac boing at the arrival of a new e-mail message bearing not one, not two, not three, but twelve new documents from a client…

Oh, God. At this rate, I’m not going to live through retirement!