Coffee heat rising

RSS feed changed to summary

If you’re reading Funny through an RSS feed, you’ll be seeing a summary instead of the former full post. This setting is recommended by WordPress, so I just discovered. You can click on “more” to see the entire text and graphics.

I have yet to figure out how one gets an RSS feed to a WordPress.com blog (apparently you can set one up through Google, but how???). From what I can tell, these freebie sites come with an RSS feed by default, unless you set up the site as private. WP’s proprietors, being very bright young things, assume as bright young things will that the rest of us are just as bright. Alas, we’re not. For the life of me, no matter how assiduously I search Support and Forums, I can not parse out how a reader subscribes to an RSS feed to one of these blogs, or whether (and how) you can see how many people have RSS feeds.

Mysterious. Possibly it’s just one of those mammalian things that’s beyond the Cretacean brain’s capacity to grasp.
apatosaurus33

View of the Good Old Days by?????via Wikipedia

Credit cards, debit cards, cash cards

Good grief! Rousted out of the sack at 6:30 ayem by the bulk trash pickup, flashing their lights into the bedroom. I thought it was the Fire Department! Grr…I’d planned to sleep in for a while today, after working myself stupid yesterday on a horrifically mind-numbing project.

{Ugh!} Speaking of bulk trash, what do we have here but an e-mail from the sidekick reporting that our brilliant author’s 87 gerjillion ditzy boxed pullouts disappeared from the file I sent her!? How many more hours am I going to have to spend on this garbage?

Where was I? Yesterday, comes in the snail-mail a notice from Sears saying its credit-card issuer, Citibank, has made “some changes.” I’ll bet, think I. Actually, I expected the “change” would be to cancel the account, which I opened only to get the benefit of a 12-month no-interest scam on some appliances and have never used since.

No. They’re writing mostly to say they’re upping the already usurious interest rate another couple of points.

Interest on this card, in the wacko free-for-all age of the unregulated market, can go as high as (hang onto your hat) 29.9 percent! For heaven’s sake. And this is on a card for Sears, a joint commonly patronized by folks who never spend their time swimming in money. Is that or is that not the most rapacious thing you ever heard?

Over at Consumerism Commentary, Flexo has a discussion going about the merits of debit cards vs. credit cards. I’ve never used a debit card, partly because I have enough numbers to memorize, thank you, without yet another PIN, but mostly because I think they’re dangerous. If someone steals it, he can not only empty your checking account, he can drain it to the bottom of your check-cashing credit line. In my case, that’s $3,000 plus whatever cash is in the account at the time.

I realize they’ve changed the law since these things first came out, so that you do have some protection from rip-off artists. But the fact remains that you may not realize what’s happening until the account is already bouncing EFTs. So even if the bank reimburses you for the stolen money, you still are faced with the enormous hassle trying to explain to all your creditors that you’re not, no indeed not, a deadbeat. Your credit could be damaged, and who has time to run through every punch-a-button maze for every faceless corporation with which we all have the pleasure of doing business? That’s a nightmare scenario that I’ve preferred to avoid.

A credit card—providing you pay it off on time—has many advantages. First, most credit card issuers back you up to some degree in a dispute with a merchant. Second, many credit card issuers provide insurance for products that are lost, damaged, or stolen shortly after the purchase. Third, many credit cards give you kickbacks in the form of cash or “rewards.” And finally, you make only one transaction a month in your checking account, rather than a score of them. This allows you to keep your money in a money market account, which earns a sou or so more in interest than a checking account does.

There is, as many PF bloggers note, the risk that you’ll spend more money when you’re waving a card around than when you’re forking over cold, hard cash. Personally, I have the opposite experience. Cash disappears out of my purse like water flowing through a pipe. Put $100 in my hand in the morning, and by evening it will be gone and, more to the point, I’ll have no idea where it went!A credit card statement gives me a paper trail, so at least I know where I diddled away the money.

And as a practical matter, I don’t diddle it away with a credit card. I budget a specific amount each month that can be charged to the credit card. The credit union automatically transfers that amount out of my paycheck into a money market checking account, from which I pay credit-card bills. Using an Excel spreadsheet, I enter each transaction as a debit against the budgeted amount, so that at any given time I know exactly how much remains to spend. I also know when I’ve spent it all, and so I know when to stop charging stuff.

This works effectively to keep me from spending more than I have.

Recently, however, American Express, which issues the card I use most, changed the closing date on a billing cycle. I dodged an overcharge only because I was ill and so didn’t make it out to buy groceries on the extra day that appeared in that cycle.

Needless to say, I was less than pleased. Because I was running pretty tight on the budget, had I bought the groceries I needed that day, I would have had to raid savings to pay last month’s bill.

It occurred to me that I could get around this problem by purchasing cash cards at Costco and Safeway (which collect most of my money) in the amount that I normally spend at those emporiums each month. This would set my budget in stone: run out of cash on a card, quit buying. It would moot any cute little changes designed to trip up credit-card users. But if I charged them on my AMEX card, I’d still get a bit of a kickback (not as much, because the Costco gasoline purchases get a very nice kickback, but something). It would also mean that if I had not used the entire balance on such a card, that much more would be available to spend the following month.

Let us ruminate…

If indeed I have not spent a month’s alloted budget at Safeway, so that I have, say, $150 left over at the end of a budget cycle, then the only place I can spend that money is at Safeway. Wouldn’t I rather have that money in the money market account, where it’s earning a little interest and where I can spend anywhere? While it’s true that the next paycheck puts another $150 spendable dollars in there, if the leftover cash remains in my account, the account contains 300 interest-bearing dollars rather than only 150 of the same.

And if a debit card is risky, how much riskier is a cash card? Anyone can use it, and as far as I can see, there’s no protection at all if you lose it or if it’s stolen. With a debit card you have a hassle. With a cash card, the money is already spent (effectively), and it’s as stealable as cash itself. Bad.

Costco’s cash card can be used to buy gasoline as well as food and household products. Costco will not take cash or checks at its gas pumps, which consistently underprice all other gas stations: you have to use an AMEX or a Costco card. If AMEX continues to close its billing cycle on unpredictable days, a cash card in the amount of $50 or so would allow me to buy gas near the end of a cycle without worrying about whether I would overrun my budget. While gas prices are low, it would even leave enough to buy a day’s worth of groceries. The theft of an entire month’s food budget would of course be a disaster, but fifty bucks wouldn’t break the bank.

It would be convenient to have a cash card to buy food and gas if, as happened a few months ago, the AMEX card mysteriously quits working. On the other hand…cash would serve the same purpose and need not be carried around in a wallet, where it’s infinitely vulnerable to diddling way, theft, or loss. It probably would be better to stash a hundred bucks in a file folder and use it as a small emergency fund.

Overall, then, pretty clearly a cash card has no advantage over a debit card and no advantage over cash. For those of us who need to see actual dollars in order to keep a grip on them, a cash card poses the same budget-busting risk as a credit card. In stop-loss terms.the debit card has only a slight advantage over cash should you lose it or have it stolen from you.

IMHO, the credit card has got it all over either a debit card or cash, assuming you can exercise a modicum of self-discipline. It’s safer, it lets you see where you’ve spent your money, and it gives you a kickback.

So… In the past I’ve made the day before and the day of the AMEX billing cycle end date “no-buy” days, to be sure all payments clear on the statement I’ve budgeted for. Now I’ll also refrain from spending on the day after the billing cycle is supposed to end. That should obviate any repercussions from this new “gotcha.”

Domani!

Huge, tedious, difficult project done today.
Tight on deadline for another assignment
(fun, at least).
Dark. Dog lobbying for a walk.
Two posts in draft. Tomorrow!

Isak Dinesen (so they say). With Pandora’s Box?

Moments of Fame

MoneyNing hosts the 161st Festival of Frugality this week, with a very large selection of highly entertaining and interesting posts, among them (possibly not highly entertaining, but at least making the grade) is Funny’s report on the success of the space heater at cutting power bills. Christian PF has a really goodlist of legal places to score free movies and TV shows, which I’m bookmarking forthwith. Single Guy Money has made up his mind to kick the killer weed (by which we mean the truly toxic one, tobacco). Tiffany at NatureMom’s Blog talks about saving money (!) on organic foods. And if you’re in the market, as I am, for recipes that will produce several days’ worth of meals, check out Cheap Healthy Good’s list of 65 such dishes…plus the adorable George Clooney photos. ?

The Make It from Scratch Carnival is hosted at A Dusty Frame this week, with a presidential inauguration theme. Funny’s recipe for slumgullion made the cut here. For those of you who are enjoying temperatures in the negative numbers, HomeEc 101 offers some serious (fancy!) comfort food. Sherry at Happy to Be at Home offers a series of tasty-sounding recipes for ground beef, plus some good advice for how to handle ground meat; we’ll be bookmarking that one, too. Here’s one from Fine Crafts Guild that I wish I’d had a few years ago: How to make your own stencils. And speaking of DIY, learn to make your own bath salts from Mrs. Accountability at Out of Debt Again.

I’ve much enjoyed the renamed and redesigned Pecuniarities, which this week hosts the 188th Carnival of Personal Financewith a fun and pretty Jane Austen theme. Funny’s report on house-swapping appears in this round-up. Sound Money Matters holds forth on one of my favorite hobbyhorses: are we morally obligated to spend ourselves stupid? Speaking of hot topics in my frying pan, as I’m struggling through editing a textbook for personal trainers, FruGal’s post on how to get the best from a gym membership rings my bell. And speaking of heat and space heaters, as we were, check out the good survey of space heaters at The Paycheck Chronicles.

Pimp Your Finances came up with a very cool presidential theme for the 48th Money Hacks Carnival, with nifty and apposite presidential quotes. Funny’s squib about the importance of reading contracts before signing them appears under (gasp!) Ronald Reagan’s handsome photo. Budgets are Sexy brings up the question of pet insurance again. Here’s something interesting: The Strump has a thoughtful article about working for a family-owned business, a subject about which I once, in my magazine-writing days, published a long feature article. Living Almost Large has a moving story about her family’s escape from poverty. Are you military? According to Military Finance Network, you’re eligible for free tax preparation. (IMHO, you should be eligible for no tax at all…but that’s one woman’s opinion, I guess.)

So it goes. Funny will host the Carnival of Personal Finance on February 2 and the Money Stories Carnival on February 10. Looking forward to both—and hope to see something from everyone! Be sure to send your stuff in!

Health Insurance: Is your employer paying its part?

One of M’hijito’s good friends, a young newlywed who had just purchased a house, was sideswiped by a fifth-wheel while he was on his motorcycle. Because he was wearing a helmet, the young man survived. However, he’s lost a kidney and his spleen, and he broke three vertebrae. He’s still in the hospital, a very sick puppy indeed.

As you might surmise from the fact that he and his bride qualified for a mortgage in these tough times, he had a good job with good benefits. Or so he thought.

Well, come to find out: his employer was not paying the employer’s half of his health insurance premiums. That means he’s not covered. He’s now relying on the state’s half-baked indigent health-care system to keep him in the hospital until he recovers enough to roll home in a wheelchair. The bills the kid has racked up will ruin him and his wife financially just as they are beginning their life together.

Lawyers say the employer is apparently broke—this is why he was welching on the health insurance policy—and they hold out little hope of getting any blood out of that turnip. The kids probably will have to declare bankruptcy, and that won’t get them out from under a mortgage that likely requires two paychecks.

I have no idea how a young person in good health who generally stays away from doctors would find out whether an employer really is paying its part of the health-care premiums, especially if it’s a small business with no HR department. Probably you could call the insurance company and confirm that you’re still on its rolls. Given the nature of our deprecession, if you have no recent confirmation that you’re enrolled in your health plan, it might be a good idea to check.

And please. Stay off motorcycles!

Suzuki photo byRich Niewiroski Jr.

Layoff Plans: Use savings or start Social Security?

The other day I realized that in theory I have enough in savings, should the legislature’s proposed destruction of the Great Desert University and the resulting layoff occur, to get by for about a year if I use the money I’ve saved to pay off the Renovation Loan to live on instead of paying the loan.

It’s an interesting and reassuring idea. But let’s consider: would it be better to use savings to live on before I reach full retirement age, when (assuming Obama doesn’t reduce everyone’s payments) I will be eligible for $1,472 a month ($17,664 a year)? Or should I, instead, take the amount for which I’m presently eligible, $1,156 ($13,872 a year), use it for living expenses until I’m 66 (full retirement age), and then raid my savings to pay it back so that I can reset my payments to the full $1,472?

I have $21,000 saved to pay off the loan’s principal, which is a 30-year fixed-rate affair with a tiny monthly payment. If it were added to my total retirement savings, it would add about $840 (at 4%) to $1,050 (at 5%) a year to my annual drawdown.

Which route would reduce my total retirement savings the least?

Let’s say I’m laid off in February. That would leave 27 months until I reach full retirement age.

If I take Social Security today, my benefit would be $1,156 a month, which is $13,872 a year.

So, if I do start taking Social Security in March 2009, I draw down $1,156 x 27 months, or $31,212. This is the amount I would have to withdraw from retirement savings to reset my Social Security payments to $1,472 at age 66, if I start taking Social Security right away.

If I do not start taking Social Security in March, but instead live for a year on the savings pot and then start drawing Social Security, at that time I have 15 months until I’m 66. Let’s assume I would still get the $1,156 I’m entitled to now, even though in fact it would be somewhat more:

$1,156 x 15 months = $17,350. This is the amount I would have towithdraw from retirement savings to reset my Social Security payments to $1,472 at age 66 if I defer taking Social Security for a year.

However, by this point I’ve already spent down $21,000 of savings: $21,000 + $17,350 = $38,340. This strategy—using savings to defer taking Social Security for a year—ends up costing me $7,128 more than starting Social Security right away!

If I kept the $21,000 and the $7,128 amount is folded into my retirement savings, I can draw down 4% or at most 5% a year: this would add $285 to $356 a year to my total retirement income from savings.

But…it’s not that simple: I’m presently paying $2,040 a year on the Renovation Loan. If I don’t prepay the principal, that goes on for another 29 years, costing me $59,160 (should I live that long). Well, $59,160 is quite a lot to pay toward a $21,000 loan, eh?

Still, I have to think about what’s in my pocket to pay for groceries. Besides, let’s get real: I’m not going to live another 29 years!

In terms of what I have to live on, irrespective of the actual cost of the loan, the full-retirement benefit is $3,792 more than the annual age 63 benefit. That’s $1,752 a year more than the annual cost of the loan. Meanwhile, if I hang on to my $21,000 and roll it into my retirement savings, it generates an extra $840 to $1,050 a year, for a total of $2,592 to $2,802 more than the loan costs.

Evidently, if these figures are correct, it would be better not to pay off the Renovation Loan but instead to start collecting Social Security right away.

In fact, if I delayed taking Social Security a year, the amount I would collect then would be larger and so the amount I’d have to pay back to the system would be larger, putting me at an even larger disadvantage if I’ve used up the $21,000 of savings.

Clearly, my best course of action is to keep my $21,000, retain the debt, and start collecting Social Security right away. Then pay back the amount I’ve collected by age 66, reset Social Security to the full retirement age amount, and draw down 4% or 5% of the $21,000 as part of my total retirement savings drawdown, for a total income from savings of about $18,600 to $23,300 a year.

This would create a maximum passive income at age 66 of $40,660. Not adjusted for inflation. I could live on that…assuming taxes haven’t reached the astronomical level by then.