Coffee heat rising

Hold the dish detergent, please

Here’s a little discovery: liquid laundry detergent works as well as (maybe better than) dish detergent, and it costs less. Possibly it can be made to cost a lot less.

In the past when I’ve burned food on a pan and not wanted to scrub it clean right after dinner, I’ve carted the dirty pan out to the utility sink, squirted a little laundry detergent in it, added water, and left it to soak. The laundry detergent seems to work a lot better than dish detergent to soak off stuck food.

I don’t like perfumes and dyes either in the kitchen or the laundry (but I draw the line at paying extra for so-called “natural” products because of the high scam potential), and so I buy Kirkland’s Ultra liquid laundry detergent and clear Ivory dish detergent. I transfer the Ivory into a vinegar cruet, partly because it gets the advertising off my kitchen counter (which is not Proctor and Gamble’s billboard!) and partly because you only need a tiny fraction of the detergent dispensed from a squirt bottle—a hard-sided container with a dripper top is a lot more economical.

Last week I was running low on dish detergent and on cash. Having made up my mind to stick to as many no-purchase days as possible, I decided that if I ran out, I’d substitute a little laundry detergent. That led me to wonder whether using laundry detergent would be more or less costly, per squirt, than Ivory dish detergent.

Wonder no more! The results from today’s Costco/Safeway run are in.

The Safeway brand of clear, relatively unadulterated laundry detergent is 7.99 cents an ounce; at Safeway, Planet eco-friendly detergent will cost you 19.98 cents an ounce. Kirkland’s clear, relatively unstinky liquid laundry detergent and its “green” variant are both the same: 7.64 cents an ounce.

Ivory was selling for 9.96 cents an ounce at Safeway.

You probably could get Ivory cheaper somewhere else, and if you don’t mind blue, green, or orange dye in your cleaning products, you’d no doubt pay less to wash your dishes.

The difference between the Ivory and the Kirkland detergent is 2.32 cents an ounce, not an inconsiderable amount—especially if you wash all your dishes by hand.

Now, laundry detergent is highly concentrated. If you wanted to use it at the kitchen sink, you could dilute it with water—probably by a fair amount!—and still have an effective dish detergent. And that would represent a real savings.

FDIC Runs Low: Credit unions unaffected

The other day Finance Junkie picked up on an AP article to the effect that the FDIC is running low on funds. This creepy little gem of news is not as drastic as it sounds at first blush: the agency still has $45.2 billion dollars on hand, plus it has a $30 billion line of credit with the Treasury. But the fact that 117 banks with assets of $78 billion were struggling in the second quarter isn’t reassuring.

One of my RAs heard this news, too, and wondered if she should take her savings out of the bank. I advised her not to do so, but suggested if she was really worried, she could move her money to the credit union, which has a branch on the campus and which accepts students in the state university system. Credit unions are federally insured, too, but by a different entity, the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF). Like the FDIC, the NCUSIF insures your deposits in a single institution up to a maximum of $100,000, andit also covers an IRA held at a credit union up to $250,000.

A friend who works as a loan officer at the Arizona State Credit Union had this to say:

I know there is a lot of uncertainty regarding banks right now. However, I have not heard of any concerns regarding the FDIC and their ability to insure funds. The credit union has been fortunate that we are not dealing with the issues and concerns that the banks are having right now. We are solid. As you may remember, we just started really bringing on mortgage products about 3 years ago and we never did any loans that were interest only ARMS, stated income or any of the other “high risk” exotic mortgages that have caused this meltdown.

Unless things get a lot worse, your money’s safe in the bank. And if it’s not…well, then we’ve got bigger things to worry about.

Belated Moment of Fame

Oops! Asleep at the switch, I neglected to mention that 15th Finance Fiestawent up on September 11 at On a Quest to Be Debt-Free, where Funny’s “Best Jobs, Worst Jobs” squib was included. With an appropriately patriotic theme, given the date, Quest’s round-up includes some great posts from around the PF blogosphere. I was tickled to see Money Blue Book’s interesting and entertaining explanation of how credit card numbers are generated, a post I’d noticed, with amazement, some time back. Cash Money Life and readers discuss ways to get your “check engine” light diagnosed for free (or for not-so-free!). And Money Grubbing Lawyer confirms my suspicions about pet health insurance.

No-shop days boost frugality

Despite an extravagance (bought some dishes at Pier One), it looks like I’m going to end this month’s budget cycle in the black, for the first time since the memory of Person runneth not to the contrary. All I have to do is make it to Sunday without spending any more money.

This accomplishment came about simply by staying out of stores. Every day you can stay away from a store (or a gas station) is a dollar saved. With the week-to-week budget, I’ve found that if I can avoid laying out cash in, say, week 2, there’s enough in week 3 to cover the deferred spending. Or if I overspend in week 2, I can catch up by pinching pennies in week 3.

A day or two, or even three, is not an unreasonable length of time to hold off buying most necessities. I’m completely out of onions, for example, but so far the deprivation hasn’t killed me. I’ve evaded emptying the gas tank by telecommuting a day this week; I’d planned to telecommute again today, but in fact there’s enough gas in the tank to get me to campus and back, and so I’ll probably go out there this morning. If the gauge were closer to empty, though, I could make the round trip on two gallons. Six dollars would not push me into the red this week; though in past weeks it would have.

Before the run-up in gas prices, I had to make a conscious effort to stay out of the stores where I routinely buy supplies: I’d work “no-shop days” into my schedule. But thanks to the exuberant increase in the price of gasoline, no-shop days have become habitual. Not only that, but because I now shop exclusively in stores along my commute, I no longer shop at Home Depot.

And that, my friends, generates a surprising savings.

Last weekend I needed a few things I didn’t think I could find at the Ace Hardware, plus some potting soil, which is overpriced at Ace and at the nursery. So I made a special trip up to the Depot, several miles from my house.

One bag of potting soil, three timer gadgets for the garden hoses, three $1.37 bags of plastic plugs to cut off the irrigation lines, two cheesy plastic cord reels (last time I was in there, they hadn’t had the kind of reels I needed for months—grab it while you can get it), a bag of palm tree fertilizer, and a six-pack of tiny bedding plants came to $107.

I couldn’t believe it!

The largest single expense was the hose timers: about $20 apiece. Coincidentally, the style I wanted (a thing that resembles a kitchen timer) was the cheapest available. So that accounts for $60 + 8.3% tax: $65. With any luck, that cost eventually that will pay for itself in water savings—if the plastic junk doesn’t fall apart before the timers have recovered that much from the water bill. But forty-two bucksfor a bag of dirt, a bag of nitrogen, a few pieces of plastic, and some seedlings?

Apparently I’m not the only one who’s concluded that Home Depot cuts too much out of the budget. At 1:00 on Sunday afternoon, the parking lot was half empty. Without using my disabled sticker, I got a space right in front of the door. I’ve neverbeen able to park in front of the store; not ever. On weekends especially, the place was jammed.

No more.

The weird thing is, I’m not missing Home Depot. Its bazaar-like layout leads you to spend more than you have to on things you don’t really need. The flimsy cord reels, for example: I needed them last Christmas. Somehow I’ve struggled through nine months without them. Clearly I could have lived the rest of my life unburdened by cord reels. And had I been in Ace Hardware, I would have gone directly to the shelves that stocked what I needed and, not wandering through the electric department in search of irrigation plumbing, I probably wouldn’t have been reminded that I “needed” cord reels. Nor would I have purchased the plants, since Ace doesn’t carry them: that impulse buy would have been deferred until I could make a special trip to the nursery, at which time I’d have a list of the specific plants I needed and so would not have picked up just anything that struck my fancy.

After the $107 hit at Home Depot, I made a run on Costco for food and gas ($111), stopping by Fabric Depot along the way to pick up some yardage to make the coveted placemats ($32). This left $125 in the week’s budget—the final week in the August-September budget cycle. I did spend nine bucks on a miserable little lunch on the campus one day this week, only because I was so hungry I couldn’t go without some food, and another twenty on a few groceries. After subtracting last week’s $77 overrun, I’m still $17.51 in the black. And for the whole month: $151.99!

w00t!

Financial Advisor to Investor: Don’t panic!

Below, an exchange that started with an update from my financial advisor.

Beloved youngish partner of Financial Dudes, LLC, to Funny about Money:

To enhance our ability to remain patient with respect to our long-term investment strategy, we raised the cash level in your portfolio again, by trimming allocations to specific securities.

In addition, we initiated the process to upgrade the quality of our client’s money market holdings to a U.S. Treasury based money market to avoid the turmoil swirling around some money market funds. If you were not in a U.S. Treasury money fund, you will see some activity in your affected accounts in the next day or so.

There certainly has been a tremendous amount of news to digest lately, and we are navigating these markets with your long-term goals in mind. We have seen, and likely will continue to see, short-term volatility in the value of many investments that we hold.

If you have any questions or concerns, simply give us a call.

Funny to BYPoFD:

Thanks, John–

I have about ten or twelve grand in Vanguard’s Prime Money Market fund. VG is claiming it’s not invested in Lehman or related unhappy sites, & so I’m guessing it’s OK to leave the money there… Would you advise moving that money to a different fund? Or into a credit union money market, which just now earns a grand 1.88 percent?

best, –vh

BYPoFDto Funny:

We just moved it to be on the safe side and don’t think there will be any issues with the money market. We will move it back at some point. I wouldn’t really fret the Vanguard money market as they are normally on the conservative side and I don’t think there will be any issues.

Funny toBYPoFD:

Good. I’d pretty much reached the same conclusion.

Doesn’t appear to be much safety anywhere in the current storm, eh?

BYPoFD to Funny:

Not really. Even putting it under your mattress you run the risk of someone stealing it. Eventually we will work through all the problem companies and the ones that survive will be the big winners like in the early 90’s. This seems to be happening with BofA.

The long and the short of it:

Don’t dive out of your money market fund. Especially if it’s with Vanguard. Stay the course.

Money market drops below a dollar a share

Here’s a little gem in today’s International Herald-Tribune: the Primary Fund, part of one of the largest and oldest money market funds around, has dropped its share value to 97 cents.

Now a loss of three cents a share isn’t going to break any of us up in business. But…well, heck. Dunno about you, my friends, but being the cheapskate that I am, I don’t want to see even three pennies go away. I have a fair amount sitting in Vanguard’s Prime Money Market, cash saved to pay off the Renovation Loan and to double as an emergency fund. Since it’s not invested in stocks or bonds, it could just as easily lay fallow in the credit union as at Vanguard. At the credit union, it’s insured.

So I called Vanguard this afternoon, where I learned I was far from the first to harry the call center employees with fussy questions about their money market funds. The young woman I reached assured me that “Vanguard is very confident” (uhm…is this a statement with meaning?) and that its money market funds are not invested in any instruments presently known to be at risk.

O.K.

I guess.

Path of least resistance is to leave the money at Vanguard. Path of medium resistance is to write a check on the fund and pay down the Renovation Loan by ten or eleven grand (and maybe plant some vegetables in the backyard to cover for the proposed emergency). Path of most resistance is to move everything over to the credit union, whose arcane rules assign a different return to each of the half-dozen different accounts it offers and so will require some figuring out.

Hmmm… Bogle, can your successors be trusted? Probably. It’s at least a strong maybe.

Do I want to pay off that loan right this minute? Nope. With the economy melting down around us, I want cash.

Am I making a larger pittance on cash savings at Vanguard than at the credit union? Yes. But only if Vanguard’s Prime Money Market Fund never breaks the dollar.

Looks to me like the path of most resistance could be the best way to go: identify the best-paying CU account (money market: 1.88%; CD: 2.23% for 3 months to 3.92% for 5 years; savings: 5% up to $1,000 and .75% over $1,000) and move the money over there.

Good grief. Just look at the complexity of those options. Makes me not want to think about it! Gut instinct, though, suggests I’d make a little less at the CU but sleep better with savings insured up to $100,000. The wee dividends don’t matter, but that deposit insurance sure does.