Coffee heat rising

Recreational Shopping: A change of habit

Spent most of today hanging out with two old friends. All afternoon, we bucketed around stores in the shiny new shopping plazas of the western suburbs. Specifically, we wanted to shop at Pier One and Target. We weren’t after anything specific: we planned just to peruse the stores as an afternoon’s outing. In a word, we were indulging in recreational shopping. Shopping for the fun of shopping.

In times past, an activity like this would lead to the diddling alway of great sums of money. I do enjoy (even covet) much of the stuff at Pier One, and Target is a posted danger zone for me. Today, though, I found myself not wanting to buy much. Matter of fact, you could say I couldn’t bring myself to reach for the AMEX card.

Pier One had some very pretty throw pillows, which I admired greatly. VickyC bought a pair, absolutely gorgeous, soon to look splendid on her sofa: marked down significantly. Also at a good mark-down, Kathy got an attractive desk lamp, which she’s been needing since she kiped her husband’s for her own desk. But you know…my sofa has four perfectly fine pillows on it. Old, maybe; a little stale to my eye, since I’ve been looking at them for several years, but clean and in good repair. A couple of years ago, I would have justified buying new pillows on the grounds that a) I like them;  b) it’s time to update “the look; and therefore c) I need them.

In the year or two since I’ve dedicated myself to a more frugal and simpler lifestyle, something strange has happened. Where before want would morph to need, now something has to be a real need before I feel that I want it. It’s not a deliberate, conscious change. It’s a change of habit that has gone on long enough to become part of my psyche.

At Target, I did buy one thing that to an outside observer might look like an impulse buy: a rope hammock. A couple of years ago, I bought one of those arc-shaped wooden hammock slings from Costco, the trees here at the Funny Farm still being too young to support the beloved old Eddie Bauer hammock that had survived into advanced decrepitude. The Costco hammock is made of sturdy outdoor fabric, allegedly an improvement over rope. It’s not. A fabric hammock collects dust, leaves, bird droppings, seeds, and various other debris. Whenever it rains, a puddle materializes in the low point; tipping the hammock to pour the water out digs a hole in the desert landscape below it. And a fabric hammock just can’t compare to rope in the comfort department: that weather-proof fabric is hot, ungainly, and ungiving. 

For quite some time, I’ve known Pawley’s Island has a hammock that probably will fit in the odd-sized Costco stand. And it’s one of the things I’ve planned to buy before the salary runs out. I’ve just been too lazy to order it online, a process I view, perversely enough, as a bit of a hassle. So when I spotted Target’s version, made of cotton (not a saggy artificial fiber), I grabbed it. If it won’t fit, Target will take it back.

I used my old hammock until it fell apart, something like twelve or fifteen years, both for loafing and for laying out laundered clothes to dry flat. The once barren yard now has plenty of shade, and I know I’ll use a more comfortable, less annoying rope number a lot more than I do the leaf-ridden, dusty, clammy fabric thing. So in this case, I think “want” actually does rise to the level of “need.” I need something to put in that fancy wooden hammock stand, so it won’t go to waste and so I can enjoy laying in the yard when the weather’s balmy. Which around here is most of the time.

The other day on the way home from a client’s place of business, I passed Scottsdale Fashion Square, formerly a regular hang-out. And it struck me that it’s been a good two years since I’ve been in that place. Then I realized I haven’t been in the tony Biltmore fashion plaza for many a moon, either. I simply have dropped the habit of shopping for fun. I no longer bat around stores to pass the time of day.

This, I expect, will be a permanent change. 

Is there anything that’s changed in your habits, either because of the current economy or as a result of a deliberate decision to alter the direction of your life?

The Magic Touch: Gadgetry review

Don’t believe in witches, do you? Well, consider this: I have an uncanny ability to control manufacturing and retailing decisions. If I like something, be it food, clothing, household items, tools, whatever, the fact of my liking it will instantly cause it to be taken off the market. Truth!

Case in point: broom-vacs. Recognize the yellow number on the right here?

EurekaVacuums

That’s an old Eureka “Boss” Model 169, a handy-dandy little plug-in vacuum that is the single best gadget ever made for vacuuming tile floors, of which I have 1,860 square feet. This device has both a decent vacuum motor and a rotor brush. It’s death on dust and dog hair. It schleps up fur without blowing it into the air, as a regular-sized vacuum cleaner invariably does. Even when the dog dunes are cornered behind the bedroom door, it grabs the hair rather than sending it airborne.

But it’s getting old: far as I can tell, you no longer can buy a filter for it. More to the point, the cleaning ladies broke its handle, so now it’s wired together with bag ties. These periodically break, dropping the machine on my foot.

Wanna buy a new one? Can’t. Eureka sensed that I wanted it, so they got rid of it.

New broom-vacs are all cordless. Know how long a cordless appliance holds a charge? Me neither, but I figure it’s not long enough to de-dust and de-dog hair 1,860 square feet of hard flooring. Nor am I interested in yet another power vampire. A Roomba has to be kept plugged into the charger at all times. Unplug it, and within a couple of days it loses its charge; recharging takes several hours. Convenient!

So, having loved the Eureka Boss out of existence, I went in search of a broom-vac with a cord. No one carries them. Not Target. Not Costco. Not Best Buy. Not Sears. Not Penny’s. Not Fry’s Electronics… But lo! one day I spotted the teal model above at a WalMart. It’s a Eureka, and it plugs in. Price was only $20, so…why not?

Well, lemme tell you why not: you get what you pay for.

This thing, a Eureka 4-in-1, is a bona fide piece of junk. It has no rotor brush, it has all the pick-up power of a light spring breeze, and it makes such a racket it terrorized the dog out of the house. Its cord is so ludicrously short you can’t even vacuum one room without an extension cord; to do two rooms, you have to link together a chain of cords. In theory, it’s a clever invention: with a little dismantling, it doubles as a hand vacuum, and it even has a plastic attachment for the purpose. Trouble is, it doesn’t vacuum worth a darn in either mode.

Moving on…  A couple of days ago, I reconsidered Costco’s offerings. Decided to try a Shark Cordless VX3 Floor Cleaner, since pretty clearly I’m never going to find a decent corded model. This is an interesting little gadget:

dcp_2458

Like the Roomba Dirt Dawg, it’s not a vacuum cleaner. It’s a battery-powered broom. It looks very much like one of those old-fashioned carpet sweepers that women of a certain age can remember from childhood. Back in the Cretaceous, my mother had one of these: it worked pretty well (for the times: certainly no worse than the hated Electrolux!) and it was blessedly quiet.

dcp_2459Flip this thing over and you find a pair of floor brushes, one that rotates around a long axle and one that spins along the right-hand side, supposedly to pick up dirt near the floorboards. Instead of operating by friction, as the old sweepers used to do, the Shark is driven by a rechargeable Ni-Cad battery that allegedly lasts 50 minutes, long enough to sweep the whole house. Dirt is swept—not vacuumed—into a spacious container in the machine’s head.  A release lever on the handle is supposed to flip this container open so you can shake the dirt out into a trash can without having to touch it or breathe in the dust. Cost is about $50, cheaper than most vacuum cleaners.  

After charging the battery the requisite 20 hours (!), I tried it on the floors yesterday. No problem going over every room in the house on one charge—it still seems to have plenty of juice. The “low” setting, intended for hard floors, pulls less power out of the battery but leaves something to be desired. I ran it on “high” for the entire job. 

Overall, it worked pretty well. My only gripe is that because it has no vacuum feature, its brushes must run directly over debris and dog hair to pick up. This means that to clean along a wall, you have to turn it so that its right-hand edge, bearing the little spinning brush, runs flush against the wall or floorboard. This can elicit some interesting contortions from the user. Oh, and the dustbin release doesn’t work: you have to manually open the bin’s flap and fish out the dog hair and dirt with your fingers, a messy and annoying task.

Compared to other power cleaning gadgets, it ran quietly. It picked up the dirt and fur effectively, and its charge lasted amply long. To test the job it did, I attached a microfiber rag to a Swiffer head and ran it over all the floors. This is a step I have to use after any vacuuming, whether with the big Panasonic or a lightweight broom-vac. On inspection, the rag was no dirtier than it would have been after cleaning with the Eureka Boss or the Panasonic.

So, overall: I’d really like another Eureka Boss 169. But failing that, the Shark VX3 is good enough for government work. Avoid the Eureka 4-in-1, though.

What’s “groceries,” anyway?

How do you account for your spending at emporiums that sell household and personal care items as well as food? In the past, I’ve let Quicken record any charge that occurred at, say, a Safeway or an Albertson’s as “groceries.” But the truth is, a substantial part of what you buy there isn’t groceries at all—it’s household gear, personal care products, or even yard-care items.

When I bought a freezer and started the great Food Hoarding Project a few weeks ago, I decided to break these things out, so that I could see what portion of my spending is really going to food and what to household and other items. It occurred to me that this might explain how some punkin’s can report spending $200 a month (or even more spectacularly parsimonious figures) on groceries for a family of four: maybe what they’re classifying as “groceries” is food and food alone.

Yesterday I made another run on Sprouts, Costco, Target, and Safeway, pretty well making my goal of storing about three months’ worth of food and household supplies. Except for a few perishable items, I now have enough meat, vegetables, cheese, beans, rice, sugar, flour, cornmeal, pasta (& cetera) to last for a good three months, stored up against the specter of catastrophic inflation or, more realistically, of a layoff. From here on in, it shouldn’t take much to keep this store up to date, and I believe I can do that in no more than one or two trips to the markets each month.

The total amount I’ve spent on groceries (bear in mind that I was almost out of everything when I started) is $519.36. That prorates out to $173.12 a month: an all-time record low for me. Especially when you realize I don’t break out pet food, what with Cassie the Corgi dining on human food.

But maybe not so record-breaking, because cleaning products, shampoo, contact lens stuff, Bandaids, and the like previously counted as “groceries.”

Since the start of the Hoarding Project, total spending on household and personal care goods has been $151.80, which would work out to $50.60 for each of the next three months. That’s not bad either, in my universe: a total of $223.72 ($173.12 + $50.60) is still significantly less than I ordinarily have spent per month in that lumped-together “groceries” category.

But…we have to bear in mind that while I was almost out of food when I started this scheme, I had plenty of household goods: lifetime supplies of Simple Green, paper towels, toilet paper, and the like. This month’s “household” category was inflated because my ancient Brita water filter gadget broke, because I dropped my indispensable little kitchen timer on the floor and broke that, and because I decided to buy a lifetime supply of Costco’s tinfoil at a very good per-unit price but a breathtaking out-of-pocket price. If I hadn’t purchased those items, the total for “household goods” would be much lower. But in either event, the total we have is unrealistic, because I avoided buying stuff I would normally need to stock up on and because I bought items that I would normally purchase once every few years, not once every few weeks or months.

IMHO, it’s a little more enlightening to be able to see how much is actually spent on food, as opposed to everything that’s spent at a particular type of merchant. I’m not sure it’s worth the trouble, though.

So, out of curiosity: how does your accounting system register “groceries”? Do you break out supermarket and big-box purchases into categories such as “food,” “household items,” “personal care items,” and the like? Or do you lump everything that appears on a supermarket receipt into one category?

A Sucker for Packaging

I love a cool package. They say a large part of product mark-up comes from and is made possible by creative packaging, especially for make-up. Well, I’m wise to make-up and buy that in drugstores, but when it comes to ice cream…doomed!

This noon I drove to the Social Security Administration’s offices up on Tatum, at the north end of Paradise Valley, a pretty tony venue for us welfare codgers. The Trader Joe’s that used to be nearest my house closed its doors in the ghost mall that is Metrocenter and moved to the corner of Tatum and Shea, in the same shopping center as—oh, yes!—Whole Foods. I hadn’t been into that Trader’s, because I can’t afford to shop at Whole Paycheck and because I rarely go into those rarefied climes. So, partly out of curiosity and partly because I needed to add a couple more pounds of TJ’s $2.76 butter to my horde, I stopped by the shopping center on the way home.

Trader Joe’s: no bigger, no fancier than the one at 20th Street and Camelback, but cleaner, tidier, less crowded, and ever so much more air-conditioned.

Trader’s doesn’t carry spices to speak of, and I’ve been needing some fennel seeds and some poppy seeds. Annnddd….I happen to know that Whole Foods carries a line of spices packaged in large bottles with the name of each spice emblazoned across the lid. So…if, like moi, you store the bottles on a slide-out pantry shelf below eye level, you can find what you’re looking for without having to write the spice name on the lid with a Sharpie (who would ever want to have to lift her dainty little hand for that kind of labor?) and without having to pick up each bottle in search of whatever you need.

Do they cost too much? Undoubtedly. Do I need a justification? Sure, here it is: these bottles are so big I can store all sorts of other things in them, such as dried herbs from my own garden. Love bottles I can reuse.

Now, it gets worse.

Headed out of the place, what should I pass but the ice cream freezer. It is not possible to avert your eyes from ice cream, is it? No. Ah, Ciao Bella…love! But what is this? Something called “Talenti Italian Ice Cream”…in clear, hard plastic containers with screw-on lids. Stuff’s about 20 cents more than Ciao Bella and the like, but O…M…G… Just look at those amazing reusable containers! The size of an extra-large cold-cream container with an enormous wide mouth, exactly the thing I’ve been looking all over for but haven’t been able to find. Exactly the thing to store, say, home-made potato soup in the freezer.

So. There they are in my fridge: two fine plastic containers. Incidentally, there’s some peach-champagne and some lemon sorbet in there, too. And the containers only cost me 20 cents apiece.
😉

The Grocery Pool: So far, so good

Mwa ha hah! It’s working! It lives! The scheme to stockpile groceries and shop as though I dwelt in a remote small town where a trip to the corner store would entail a 120-mile round trip is going well. As we enter the third week of maneuvers, I’m $91.98 in the black—and that includes purchases of everything, not just groceries. Last weekend I avoided going to the grocery store altogether (!!!!!). Yesterday I bought a couple pounds of tomatoes at a farmer’s market.

febmarbudget

Having cleaned the house, edited copy, and passed the time of day with one of my best friends, today all I really must do is continue working on the Festival of Frugality (don’t forget to send in your submissions, please!). So in theory I could make a grocery run. But…do I have to?

My cumulative shopping list says “no.” The only things I need urgently are smoke alarms and mascara; to get the smoke alarms installed, I’m gunna need to get a handyman in here, and that will entail finding someone and then persuading him to show up. Neither of those are grocery items, anyway. And though it would be good to get those smoke alarms in sooner rather than later, neither item needs to be bought right now.

If I were living in Yarnell, the desert rat’s answer to Shangri-La, would I drive 120 miles to buy these things? Probably not.

At the Farmer’s Market

Yesterday morning a friend drove into town from the far-flung suburbs so we could visit the downtown farmer’s market together. People say this is the best farmer’s market in the city. The ones I’ve seen in other parts of town have been a bit lackluster, more crafts fair than produce market, so I was curious to see what “the best” means, particularly since other bloggers say they get good deals on local produce at these operations.

Getting there was a challenge: you have to navigate the new train tracks and a labyrinth of one-way streets—the City has kindly made a nightmare of driving downtown. Parking, at least, was free: in a graveled lot with no markings, overrun by people scrambling to get space between cars left sitting cattywampus, higgledy-piggledy and willy-nilly. My friend found a paved lot, where she parked in an end space; when we went back to leave some of her purchases in the car while we walked to a restaurant, someone had parked a pickup with an extra-long truck bed at right angles to her vehicle, blocking her exit. Fortunately, the space next to her was empty, so she wriggled her car out and reparked it in that spot. While she was backing out, two drivers came along and tried to grab the empty space; if I hadn’t been standing in it, they would have blocked her from getting her car out.

We enjoyed walking around. It was a stunningly beautiful day, cool and clear. The downtown area is gentrifying apace—or it was, until the Bush economy collapsed. Strips of old, formerly abandoned 1940s stores have been renovated and repopulated with new shops, and great blocks of so-called “lofts” fill former empty lots and the sites of demolished flophouses. In downtown Phoenix, a “loft” is an overpriced condominium apartment, less overpriced now that no one can or will buy them but still out of most buyers’ reach. Sadly, the area is still populated with homeless mentally ill people living on the streets, the first and worst symptom of America’s ailing healthcare system. As I was leaving, a particularly desperate panhandler came after me and would not stop pestering me even after I got into the car and locked the door.

The farmer’s market offered more produce and preserves per square yard than others here in Arizona, but about half the booths were occupied by people selling tie-dyed shirts, crocheted scarves, wood carvings, pottery, handmade soap, lost-wax metalwork, bead jewelry, and on and on. Prices didn’t strike me as much of a bargain, considering that a raft of middlemen supposedly are cut out of the marketing process.

I bought 2.5 pounds of tomatoes—a handful of vine tomatoes, two heirlooms, and two green tomatoes that I intend to fry for breakfast this morning—for $7.39. That was not a bad price: $2.95 a pound; unclear whether these were organic, but they didn’t appear to be. Potatoes and sweet potatoes were a dollar a pound. We came across a lady selling some exceptionally delicious hummus; I proposed to buy a container of that for $3.00 and a bag of pita chips for $6.00. On second thought, though, after the vendor mentioned that the stuff didn’t contain any tahini but really was just puréed chickpeas, garlic, and olive oil, I decided nine bucks was a little much for a can of beans and a bag of chips, especially since I have a perfectly fine food processor sitting in my kitchen.

After my friend and I parted, I wondered idly how some of the prices we’d encountered would compare with with grocery-store prices. So, on the way home I stopped by AJ’s (my favorite gourmet emporium and home of the Elegantly Overpriced Commodity) and Safeway (itself no bargain corner).

At AJ’s, vine tomatoes were selling for $2.99 a pound; green tomatoes, a rarity in stores here, were offered for $3.99. Campari tomatoes, the variety I buy because they are the only tomatoes with anything resembling flavor available in this part of the country, were $4.99. Pita snacks ran from $6 to $20 for a package. AJ’s carries our vendor’s hummus: $4.99, two bucks more than buying it directly from its maker at the farmer’s market. Potatoes were $1.49 a pound.

At Safeway, I couldn’t find pita chips, but a package of pita bread sold for $2.19 for ten pieces; easy enough to paint it with olive oil, cut it into triangles, and crisp in the oven. A can of chickpeas cost all of $1.39 for organic and $1.00 for nonorganic. Campari tomatoes were selling for the same price as AJ’s; vine tomatoes were $2.69 a pound. Neither store had any heirloom tomatoes. Sweet potatoes were $1.29 a pound, but regular Idaho potatoes went for 5 pounds for 99 cents—about 25 cents a pound.

Okay. Given that you’d have to make your own hummus (a process that would take all of about 5 minutes) and substitute bread, toast, or tortilla chips if you didn’t want to dork with cutting up and toasting pita bread, let us compare the costs:

Hummus:

Farmer’s market: 3.00
Gourmet market: $4.99
Safeway DIY ingredients: $1.00 plus a few drops of olive oil and lemon juice

Tomatoes:

Farmer’s market: 2.95 a pound
Gourmet market: $2.99 to $3.99 a pound
Safeway: $2.69 a pound

Potatoes:

Farmer’s market: $1.00 a pound
Gourmet market: $1.49 a pound
Safeway: 25 cents a pound

Pretty consistently, the Safeway underpriced the farmer’s market and the AJ’s on the goods I was prepared to purchase this weekend.

Even where the farmer’s market was a few cents cheaper, one has to question the cost of the hassle factor: shopping there requires a significant investment of time. The site was so crowded and so cluttered with sellers of kitsch that it was hard to make your way to the food stands. To buy something, you were supposed to get a slip of paper on which each of your desired purchases was marked, go to a central cash collection site to pay, and then take the receipts back to each of the vendors you’d visited. This would entail elbowing your way to the desired vendors and standing in line not once, not twice, but three times for each purchase you made!

Fortunately, some of the vendors would take cash and credit cards. Just as fortunately, the hummus vendor did not, and the prospect of dorking around in two more lines deflected me from making that impulse buy. In terms of gasoline expended, the Safeway is a third as far from my house as is downtown; the AJ’s is half as far. And no panhandlers harassed me in either grocer’s parking lot.

For a special outing, it was fun. But day by day, it’s not a venue I would add to my regular round of places to buy groceries.