Coffee heat rising

FeedBurner in; Feedburner out

Very nice. I got FeedBurner ensconced on FaM, having discovered an error in the HTML snippet’s code and having persuaded a friendly IT guru to fix it, with sterling results.

Further observation, however, left the Beloved Proprietor of this website wondering. First, it became clear that the vaunted statistics we were to enjoy applied (duh!) only to those who elected to opt viewing the site in favor of having posts delivered to them by e-mail. Second, it quickly became clear that widespread complaints to the effect that stats were in error are probably correct.

Why, the Royal We asked Ourself, why are We doing this? The answer was simple: We don’t know. WordPress’s stats a) provide everything FaM needs to know and b) actually work, without requiring that one navigate to a different site. So, we decided to delete the Feedburner site, here and at The Copyeditor’s Desk.

The Copyeditor’s Desk, btw, now has its own domain name and concommitant URL: thecopyeditorsdesk.com.

Please feel free to subscribe to either or both(!), using your own choice of RSS feeds.

B-a-a-a-d basselope! Frugality 0, Spending 1

Okay, I fell off the frugality wagon with a resounding thud this afternoon, cleverly managing it at a moment when I probably should be pinching every penny that comes my way. What the heck: life’s short and tomorrow we die.

For several years, I’ve been quietly watching for a sideboard that would go with my dining room table, please my finicky tastes, and not bankrupt me. Right now there’s a console table sitting in the dining room, the sort of thing you put behind your sofa to hold a lamp. That’s what the table’s doing there: holding a lamp. It has no storage, and storage is desperately needed, given that the former homeowner’s kitchen remodel was beautiful but short on cabinet space. So I’ve wanted something with shelves and maybe even a couple of drawers.

Today a friend and I headed out in search of a desk to fit a small space in her house. After several hours spent traveling across the city, exploring many new stores we had never visited, we ended up at the Crate and Barrel, which is having a summer sale. And what should we see but…ta-DAAA! Not just “a” sideboard on sale, but THE sideboard, marked down $550.

At $1190, the price was still a bit rich for my blood, but I do have it in my diddle-it-away savings. True, it will drain Diddle-It-Away to zero, but why does one have diddle-it-away savings if one does not intend to diddle them away? It is incredibly gorgeous. It’s also set up to serve as a media center, so if I have to move to a smaller house in the future, it’s versatile enough to adapt to a different purpose.

Even though I’m sure I could have acquired something cheaper, this is well made with solid wood and mortise-and-tenon construction, and it’s exactly what I’ve been looking for. M’hijito will get the console table — also a very nice piece of furniture — and I will now have a place for serving items presently stashed in a back closet and in the garage. So I guess I don’t feel too guilty…after I get over the sticker shock, I’m sure I’ll be very happy I bought it. Especially if I don’t lose my job….

Is the Layoff Boom about to Fall?

Out at the Great Desert University, rumors float on the breeze like leaves in the autumn air. We our told that Our Leader will make a momentous announcement on the first day of the fall semester, in a week or so. Nothing anyone hears indicates the contents of this message will please the peons. Some expect to hear of massive layoffs. Others expect a hiring freeze. Still others predict we will be told the satellite campuses are to be deemed “teaching campuses” and the main campus will be the “research institution.” Paranoia rises. The facts support the general angst but confirm none of the dire predictions.

Factoid:

The university’s budget has been slashed to and peeled off the bone.

Factoid:

Our Leader’s elaborate building campaign, which could bankrupt a healthy institution in good times, continues apace.

Factoid:

Caps on class sizes have risen into the stratosphere. Lecturers and instructors — nontenurable faculty who teach four or five sections a semester — groan under obscene courseloads, with ten times more students than anyone could reasonably be expected to teach adequately. Tenure-track and tenured faculty also find themselves facing classrooms filled with more students than they can teach. Faculty are eliminating most or all writing assignments and assessing performance on the basis of a few machine-graded, computerized exams.

Factoid:

HR staff have been seen acting strangely. They refuse to meet your eyes, and at “benefits fairs” their responses to questions make it clear they’ve been told, on pain of dire consequences, to keep their tongues on a tight leash. One of them remarked to a colleague, semiprivately, “Oh…you don’t know what’s happening.”

Factoid:

Administrative staff who do know what’s up have leaked hints that something very grim is slouching toward Bethlehem.

What to Make of It?

Heaven only knows. I hesitate to assume the worst, although knowing that place, anything is possible. If we do indeed face layoffs, I would be high on the list of the expendable. My job is exempt, meaning my contract says I can be canned at any time, for no reason. Although one could argue that our office supports the university’s core mission of research and publication, others could say faculty could get by just fine without us. If the bad news is “only” a hiring freeze (unlikely: the last hiring freeze was not announced from the balcony with trumpets blaring fanfares), my job will still be at risk, since the director of the graduate program whose students staff our office walked with short notice this summer. A hiring freeze will mean he can’t be replaced, which will mean his program will die instantly, which will mean my office will quickly go away because my staff will disappear. In either event, I lose my job.

I’m now eligible to take early Social Security payments, although I would prefer not to. If I collect SS now, the amount will be peanuts. If I wait until I’m 66 (or even 65, when Medicare kicks in), my income will be slightly more generous. I’ll be 65 in 22 months; COBRA will cover me for 18 months, and so if I can hang onto my job for just four more months, I can at least keep myself insured if I’m laid off.

Being averse, as I am, to jumping off the high wire without a safety net, I reconnoitered the resources I could use to survive if I’m canned. Figuring 4% of my retirement savings as a drawdown and subtracting from that the 12 grand that’s going into the Investment House, investment income right now would be $10,254. Because I haven’t yet applied the Renovation Loan payoff fund toward principal but instead have stashed the money in low-risk mutual funds, I have $9,848 in cash that I could live on. The university has to pay me for 175 of my 275 hours of accrued vacation time at my regular pay rate; the figure on my paycheck seems to says that amount is $3,214, a little more than one month’s net pay (I believe they have to pay my gross rate for this, which would come to $5,280). Also, the state pays retiring employees who have accrued 1,000 hours of sick leave a kind of severance bonus in the amount of 50% of their hourly wage per sick-leave hour; for me this would come to $17,160. It’s not paid in one swell foop, however: they dole it out over three years. So, in the first year after severance I would get $5,714. Pretax Social Security, if I started taking it this year, would add $12,228 to the pot.

Amazingly, all these bits and pieces add up to something close to my net pay. Though the bottom line is pretax, few of the figures that go into it are earned income, and so my taxes might be relatively low.

COBRA will inflate my healthcare premiums from $30 to $473 per month, but even that would be affordable for a couple of years. It would be tight, but I might not be forced to move out of my home, especially if I could engineer a steady flowof freelance work.

Thank goodness I saved the Renovation Loan snowflakes to double as an emergency fund, instead of paying them directly to the loan principle!

Matter o’fact, the scenario above isso positive that I wondered what would happen if I delayed collecting Social Security. Could I get by until I can collect full Social Security payments? Well….

Foregoing Social Security for two more years, I’d have to come up with an extra $7,000 to make ends meet, just barely.

But that’s not unreasonable: I could pull it off with a part-time job — maybe greeting shoppers at the WalMart! Here, too, a steady flow of freelance work would do the trick. At The Copyeditor’s Desk we’re hoping to make $1,000 a month per person by the end of the year. If we meet that goal, next year’s $12,000 annual income would just about replace the amount of Social Security I’d get if I started drawing payments now.

So, if they can me, the world is not going to end. I may have to sell my home, but not right away. There will at least be time to see if I can get by, cobbling together a living from four to six different sources. A year or so hence, though, I’ll have to either cut my expenses drastically or find income to replace the one-time vacation pay reimbursement and the three years of sick leave payments. The slightly increased Social Security payments I would have by waiting to collect until I’m 65 will not substitute for those amounts.

I don’t like it. But I’ll survive.

DANCE TO SPRING! (well…late summer)


A rose for WordPress

Funny is now officially part of WordPress! Hooorayyyy!

It was a project, because I haven’t the faintest idea what I’m doing, but the excellentsupport staff here at WordPress managed, with great patience and elaborate effort at explaining things in words of one syllable, to help me move the domain name over here. Thank you, Anthony and Douglas!

So, welcome to Funny’s new home. I hope you like the design, which was cadged directly from one of WordPress’s templates.

I’m now going to start publishing content that I copied-&-pasted over from iWeb. The result is that many of you will get pinged by posts dating as far back as December 25. My apologies — if there’s a way to turn off the ping function, I haven’t figured it out.

Originally I thought I should start from the beginning and work forward. However, slapping posts over here one by one is a time-consuming process. After a while it became apparent that it would be better to work backward from the present. As of now, I’ve got August and part of July uploaded, plus December and January. In the evenings while I’m sitting in front of the idiot box, I will keep moving copy, and so every now and again more outdated pings will go out. Sorreeee! 😳

Today being a workday, I must spend the next few hours editing feminist tracts. However, later today or tomorrow I’ll try to get FeedBurner onto the site. Be patient! It takes me a while to figure these things out.

The National Debt: The mortgage meltdown x 10?

Good grief! Did you hear the Diane Rehm Show on PBS this morning? She talked about the $53 trillion national debt our government has run up. She had the former U.S. Comptroller General, a Wall Street Journal poobah and former member of a Presidential council on economic growth, and a think tank researcher, all of whom agreed that the gigantic national debt, which represents about $440,000 worth of debt for EVERY AMERICAN HOUSEHOLD, poses a huge threat to the economy.

The scariest part I heard while I was jockeying my car through 40 minutes of rush-hour traffic was a comparison between some of the elements that have led to the current fiasco and the similar short-sighted behaviors that led to the mortgage crisis. These guys say the crisis likely to come out of the mess created by an untenable national debt will be many tens of timesworse than the mortgage industry meltdown. We are looking at the potential meltdown of the U.S. economy during the next twenty years.

At the very least, government services, including Social Security, Medicare, and many programs that support businesses, agriculture, and the middle class will have to be severely curtailed or even eliminated. “Promises” made by the government to its citizens, said the guests,cannot be fulfilled.

The cause of this fiasco has been lack of competent leadership for the past decade or more, and the misguided policy of cutting taxes while failing to cut spending. Solution offered by at least one of the gentlemen: “grow the economy as fast as we can.” Uh huh. Grow the economy? While we’re in a recession that some of our leaders will not even acknowledge as recession? Gimme a break.

On an individual level, I don’t know what any of us can do about it, except to throw the rascals out of Washington…a dollar late and a day short. The corruption has to stop and the woo-woo “thinking” has to go. It will take one heck of a lot longer than eight years to get this country out of the mess the present leadership has created. It will be amazing if the next presidential administration manages to do anything other than hang onto the helm as the ship runs aground.

What is my plan?

  • Keep my job until I drop in the traces.
  • “Grow” my own economy by fostering a side business.
  • Pay off all debt and don’t run up any new debt.
  • Once the debt is paid, squirrel away every penny I can.
  • Build an emergency plan designed to survive a breakdown of the infrastructure, to include stocks of food,water, and propane.
  • Try to preserve capital in such a way that it can be handed down to the next generation, who will need it.

That’s all I can think of to do. And you? Got any ideas?

A$king and re¢eiving

“A$k and ye shall re¢eive” is the motto of the American Society of Journalists and Authors, to which I used to belong until I figured out that freelance writing is a losing proposition. ASJA put me on to the fact that publishers don’t pay a fair rate for work done; they pay what they know they can get away with. They bank on the tendency of writers to work in their own little garrets, to cultivate social lives best described as null and void, and to be way too shy to ask other writers how much they earn. Magazine publishers in particular will pay one writer, say, $1.00 a word and another 50¢ or 75¢ for the same kind of work of the same quality. They recognize that some wannabe writers are so anxious to see their bylines in print they not only would work for free, they’d pay the magazine to publish them, and so the magazine plays that for all it’s worth. Which is plenty.

Entertainingly, today I learned that book publishers will do something similar when they outsource editorial work. My young business partner (late one of my research assistants) and I have been proofreading detective novels for a company that publishes nothing but mystery fiction. Because the work is easy and the copy so entertaining it’s hard to believe anyone would pay you to read it, we’ve been accepting the publisher’s offered rate of $12 an hour.

In response to our talking up our new enterprise, The Copyeditor’s Desk,a book packaging company e-mailed me and asked our rates for proofreading. Without thinking about the mystery publisher, I gave her a rate on the very lowest end of what I actually expect to earn: $25 an hour. Proofreading does not rise to the level of rocket science, and so I couldn’t reasonably ask for the amount I try to get by manipulating my copyediting page rate to fit the difficulty of the copy: $60 an hour. But on the other hand, there comes a point where you can’t just give it away. I figured $25 would be a bit rich for her blood.

To my astonishment, she wrote back and said our proposed rate was in the range of what they’ve been paying others.

Whoa! You are paying proofreaders twenty-five bucks an hour? You’re paying more than twice what we’ve been earning reading mystery novels? Are we talkin’ the same people who have the skills you could have expected from a bright high-school graduate a quarter-century ago?

Huh. Wonder what they would have paid if I’d suggested their arcane interior decorating books need a proofreader with a Ph.D. to make them right. . .

So the message is this: Don’t be shy about asking what you think your time is worth. If you don’t get it, maybe it’s for the best: the next client or employer will come up to your standards. And find out, even if it means bald-facedly asking colleagues what they earn, how much others in your trade or profession are earning for similar work.
Ignoran¢e is not bli$$.